On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:20 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote: > ... unless you're a glutton for punishment, don't get the Celeron > version, spend the extra bucks and get the Pentium M.
Besides the dearth of on-board cache, what are the other drawbacks of a Celeron? To fit the dimensional requirement I was given (5"x5"x~1"), the SBC must be passively cooled. However, I'm not finding a Pentium-M solution that can be passively cooled and meets our availability requirements. I have found a 600 MHz Celeron solution, but has half the L2 cache. In our application, we'll be pulling full throttle from the USRP, maybe FIR filtering, and then pushing back out to USRP. Not too heavy on the signal processing. All advice appreciated. - Lee P.S. Some potential solutions: http://www.gms4sbc.com/P60x_BO.html (can't meet availability) http://www.kontron-emea.com/index.php?id=82&cat=58 (JRex-PM, can only air cool Celeron M 600 MHz) _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
