On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 17:56 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:22:09PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 15:52 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> >
> > > just collect data with decim = 10, then interp by 3 (6.4Msps to
> > > 19.2Msps), then upshift. The 0.9 cod
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:22:09PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 15:52 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
>
> > just collect data with decim = 10, then interp by 3 (6.4Msps to
> > 19.2Msps), then upshift. The 0.9 code need two changes, one to
>
> Some more fat can be squeezed out
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 15:52 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> just collect data with decim = 10, then interp by 3 (6.4Msps to
> 19.2Msps), then upshift. The 0.9 code need two changes, one to
Some more fat can be squeezed out of the pipeline if the 'upshift
to 5.75MHz' and FPLL could be combined. B
This works a bit more effeciently in matching a usrp to the atsc code
(either all 0.9, or part 0.9 and part 2.x):
Instead of: collect data with usrp decim = 8, then interp by 5 (8Msps
to 40) then decim by 2 (40Msps to 20) while upshifting to 5.75MHz -
just collect data with decim = 10, then inter
