On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 06:08:45PM +0200, Martin Braun wrote:
>
> But don't worry, WX widgets will be around for a while, but we won't
> be adding functionality, and will be officially marking them
> deprecated them (most likely) in 3.8. *Maybe* they will go away in
> 3.9, but that's a long way ahe
On 04/15/2014 06:14 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> If you thought the 3.6 to 3.7 transition was hard for people, doing
> a transition where the WX widgets are no longer available will be
> even harder, by a significant amount.
>
> --
> Marcus Leech
> Principal Investigator
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 12:08 PM, Martin Braun wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2014 04:32 PM, Marcus Müller wrote:
>>
>>> QT, like Martin was saying :)
>>>
>> Right. We've discussed this on several dev calls, not sure if here on
>> the list.
>> In the far fut
On 04/15/2014 12:08 PM, Martin Braun wrote:
On 04/15/2014 04:32 PM, Marcus Müller wrote:
QT, like Martin was saying :)
Right. We've discussed this on several dev calls, not sure if here on
the list.
In the far future, we want to focus on QT (for less dependencies etc.).
We (or rather, Tom for t
On 04/15/2014 04:32 PM, Marcus Müller wrote:
> QT, like Martin was saying :)
Right. We've discussed this on several dev calls, not sure if here on
the list.
In the far future, we want to focus on QT (for less dependencies etc.).
We (or rather, Tom for the most part) have been porting all features
