Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-04-05 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Stefan Fehrle wrote: > > Tom Rondeau schrieb: >>> Now I can build the firmware. >>> >>> When I copy "txrx.bin" from the subfolder apps to the sd-card. I can't >>> connect to the USRP2. The led e and f burns. The GNU Radio Companion >>> (GRC) >>> stops the program wi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-04-05 Thread Stefan Fehrle
Tom Rondeau schrieb: >> Now I can build the firmware. >> >> When I copy "txrx.bin" from the subfolder apps to the sd-card. I can't >> connect to the USRP2. The led e and f burns. The GNU Radio Companion >> (GRC) >> stops the program with the error message "RuntimeError: No USRPs found >> on >> int

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-03-31 Thread Tom Rondeau
> Now I can build the firmware. > > When I copy "txrx.bin" from the subfolder apps to the sd-card. I can't > connect to the USRP2. The led e and f burns. The GNU Radio Companion (GRC) > stops the program with the error message "RuntimeError: No USRPs found on > interface eth1". > > When I copy "txr

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-03-31 Thread Stefan Fehrle
Eric Blossom schrieb: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:05:25PM +0200, Stefan Fehrle wrote: >> >> Eric Blossom schrieb: >> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:38:08AM +0200, Stefan Fehrle wrote: >> >> >> >> I wanted to build the USRP2 firmware to enable the testclk at J503, >> but >> >> I >> >> have some erro

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-03-30 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:05:25PM +0200, Stefan Fehrle wrote: > > Eric Blossom schrieb: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:38:08AM +0200, Stefan Fehrle wrote: > >> > >> I wanted to build the USRP2 firmware to enable the testclk at J503, but > >> I > >> have some errors. I download the source with the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-03-30 Thread Stefan Fehrle
Eric Blossom schrieb: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:38:08AM +0200, Stefan Fehrle wrote: >> >> I wanted to build the USRP2 firmware to enable the testclk at J503, but >> I >> have some errors. I download the source with the command "git clone >> git://gnuradio.org/gnuradio >> " and the mb-gcc from h

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-03-30 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:38:08AM +0200, Stefan Fehrle wrote: > > I wanted to build the USRP2 firmware to enable the testclk at J503, but I > have some errors. I download the source with the command "git clone > git://gnuradio.org/gnuradio > " and the mb-gcc from http://gnuradio.org/tools/ > > T

[Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build error

2010-03-29 Thread Stefan Fehrle
I wanted to build the USRP2 firmware to enable the testclk at J503, but I have some errors. I download the source with the command "git clone git://gnuradio.org/gnuradio " and the mb-gcc from http://gnuradio.org/tools/ Then I execute the commands "./bootstrap" and "./configure.gnu MB_GCC=/usr/loc

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-04 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 03:22:52PM -0400, Jeff Long wrote: >> >> Right now __moddi3, __umoddi3, __divdi3 and __udivdi3 contain inlined >> versions of __udivmoddi4. Un-inlining them should save about 5KB in >> the worst case, 4KB typical. I'm working on it. (These routines >> implement signed an

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-04 Thread Jeff Long
Right now __moddi3, __umoddi3, __divdi3 and __udivdi3 contain inlined versions of __udivmoddi4. Un-inlining them should save about 5KB in the worst case, 4KB typical. I'm working on it. (These routines implement signed and unsigned 64-bit divides and mods. We use these in dealing with our 64

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-04 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:10:36PM -0700, Matt Ettus wrote: > Jeff Long wrote: >> Generated a new txrx.bin using EDK101 and put it on the SD >> card. Works! I'm assuming that's the correct app, based on >> strings on the provided SD. BTW, is any of this documented >> yet? > > Yes, txrx is the co

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-03 Thread Matt Ettus
Jeff Long wrote: Generated a new txrx.bin using EDK101 and put it on the SD card. Works! I'm assuming that's the correct app, based on strings on the provided SD. BTW, is any of this documented yet? Yes, txrx is the correct app to use, and is the one which is on the SD card which I ship out

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-03 Thread Jeff Long
Generated a new txrx.bin using EDK101 and put it on the SD card. Works! I'm assuming that's the correct app, based on strings on the provided SD. BTW, is any of this documented yet? Where do printf's go to? Using -Os vs. -O2 shaves off another 500 bytes if you ever need the space. Takes txrx

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-03 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:58:02PM -0400, Jeff Long wrote: > Trying out the firmware build ... > > - had to comment out apps/rx_only_v2.c, line 104 > (static volatile bool link_is_up = false) to avoid > multiple definitions ... does not appear to be used > in this file and is declared static

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-03 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:58:02PM -0400, Jeff Long wrote: > Trying out the firmware build ... > > - had to comment out apps/rx_only_v2.c, line 104 > (static volatile bool link_is_up = false) to avoid > multiple definitions ... does not appear to be used > in this file and is declared static

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-03 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:58:02PM -0400, Jeff Long wrote: > Trying out the firmware build ... > > - had to comment out apps/rx_only_v2.c, line 104 > (static volatile bool link_is_up = false) to avoid > multiple definitions ... does not appear to be used > in this file and is declared static

[Discuss-gnuradio] USRP2 firmware build

2008-10-03 Thread Jeff Long
Trying out the firmware build ... - had to comment out apps/rx_only_v2.c, line 104 (static volatile bool link_is_up = false) to avoid multiple definitions ... does not appear to be used in this file and is declared static - build exceeds size of flatmem (0x8000) ... bumped to 0xa000 and