Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-18 Thread Matt Ettus
ILKYOUNG KWOUN wrote: Guys, I managed another comparison test last night. http://zoolu.co.kr/episodes/6 Just to follow up on this a little more, if you generate a complex sine wave in octave or Matlab, quantize it to 16 bits, and then plot the fft, you will see similar behavior. Matt

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-18 Thread Matt Ettus
You are correct about the fft level not scaling with fft size. I remember putting this in some time ago, but it isn't there now, so I don't know what happened. In any case, I did some further analysis on the spurs. We are seeing 2 different things on the USRP1 and USRP2 The USRP1 definit

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-16 Thread ILKYOUNG KWOUN
Guys, I managed another comparison test last night. http://zoolu.co.kr/episodes/6 *. Test tone signal quality I used a siggen as good as I could get. :-) According to the spectrum analyzer, it seemed that the siggen did not generate any noticeable harmonics(1st and 2nd pictures). Actually, I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-13 Thread ILKYOUNG KWOUN
Thank you so much, guys. I will setup another experiment regarding your advices and post the result. Since I have to arange my friend's lab, I probably could do it on weekends. :-) Best regards, Ilkyoung. ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gn

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-13 Thread Matt Ettus
ILKYOUNG KWOUN wrote: Hi, folks, I recently did some comparison test with my USRP and USRP2 boxes and got slightly different results. Test setup - Signal source : HP signal generator (forgot the name of the equipment) - Daughter cards for USRP and USRP2 : BasicRX - Test configuration : I divid

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-13 Thread Firas A.
. and Don't forget to reduce input signal level. I see distortion in your graphs. Use -20dBm as input signal level. Regards, Firas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/USRP-and-USRP2-FFT-result-comparison-analysis-help-tp21438485p21441059.html Sent from the GnuRadio maili

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-13 Thread Firas Abbas
Hi, 1) The comparison is not fair with these decimation values. For USRP2, you used a decimation of 25. Using this odd decimation will disable the FIR filters of the USRP2 FPGA. 2) To make the comparison valid, I suggest for you to use decimation of 64 for USRP and decimation of 100 for USRP2.

[Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and USRP2 FFT result comparison analysis help

2009-01-13 Thread ILKYOUNG KWOUN
Hi, folks, I recently did some comparison test with my USRP and USRP2 boxes and got slightly different results. Test setup - Signal source : HP signal generator (forgot the name of the equipment) - Daughter cards for USRP and USRP2 : BasicRX - Test configuration : I divided a 12.1MHz CW signal f