> I think the limitation is on the 8051 end. One 512-byte packet takes
> 8.53 microseconds to cross the USB channel, and the 35.7 MByte/sec
> sustained rate implies the 8051 sets up the next packet in only 5.81
> microseconds. I don't think there is any pipelining at this level.
You're probably
Uwe -
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 08:35:22PM +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > "ldoolitt" == ldoolitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ldoolitt> Hi - I'm bringing up a board http://recycle.lbl.gov/llrf4/
> ldoolitt> with a hardware and software USB stack based on and (for this
> Some hints for yo
> "ldoolitt" == ldoolitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ldoolitt> Hi - I'm bringing up a board http://recycle.lbl.gov/llrf4/
ldoolitt> with a hardware and software USB stack based on and (for this
...
Some hints for your part list:
- consider the Spartan 3E family versus Spartan3. 3E is
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:40:06AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm bringing up a board
> http://recycle.lbl.gov/llrf4/
> with a hardware and software USB stack based on and (for this purpose)
> equivalent to the GNU Radio design, and measured its USB data transfer
> capabilities m
Hi -
I'm bringing up a board
http://recycle.lbl.gov/llrf4/
with a hardware and software USB stack based on and (for this purpose)
equivalent to the GNU Radio design, and measured its USB data transfer
capabilities more carefully than I have done before. There is a
distant possibility someone on
