On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:10:24PM -0400, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> Yes. From a scheduler standpoint, loops, as in traditional control
> loops with some required and guaranteed delay, are incredibly
> inefficient. And instead of figuring out how to support something like
> that, Eric made the decision v
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Martin Lülf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since I also had trouble with this issue at first, please allow me to
> clarify this further: GNURadio does not support looping of blocks. Inside a
> single block you can loop as often as you wish and that is exactly how the
> available
Hi,
since I also had trouble with this issue at first, please allow me to
clarify this further: GNURadio does not support looping of blocks.
Inside a single block you can loop as often as you wish and that is
exactly how the available PLLs in GNURadio are made. Just search the
mailing list fo
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:31:58AM -0700, tom sutherland wrote:
> I am trying to make a simple PLL using a VCO but I get an error
> "RuntimeError:flow graph has loops!". Anyway around that?
Nope, stock GNU Radio does not support loops. There's plenty of PLLs
available already, though.
MB
--
Karl
I am trying to make a simple PLL using a VCO but I get an error
"RuntimeError:flow graph has loops!". Anyway around that?
Thanks...Tom___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
