On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:10:24PM -0400, Tom Rondeau wrote: > Yes. From a scheduler standpoint, loops, as in traditional control > loops with some required and guaranteed delay, are incredibly > inefficient. And instead of figuring out how to support something like > that, Eric made the decision very early on to just not allow them at > all. > > You can use the asynchronous message passing interface to do loops.
If this is any help, there's an example for async loops in gr-digital/examples/ofdm/rx_ofdm.grc. MB -- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Communications Engineering Lab (CEL) Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun Research Associate Kaiserstraße 12 Building 05.01 76131 Karlsruhe Phone: +49 721 608-43790 Fax: +49 721 608-46071 www.cel.kit.edu KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association
pgp2m3BCBh81x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
