Tom,
Thanks for pointing me in a new direction. I've spent this morning reading
about the scheduler and I came across your Scheduler Details slide show
from 2013. I saw the message passing protocol on slide 15, which makes
sense, but I am not reaching the first bullet point, my messages are not
be
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Washbourne, Logan <
lwas...@ostatemail.okstate.edu> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> So unfortunately I started using git after I found out that the code
> wasn't entering general_work. It was actually the reason I started using
> git, so this wouldn't
Tom,
Thanks for the reply!
So unfortunately I started using git after I found out that the code wasn't
entering general_work. It was actually the reason I started using git, so
this wouldn't happen again haha. Thanks for the temp files tip, I'll try to
fix that today.
For the blocks, I think I j
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Washbourne, Logan <
lwas...@ostatemail.okstate.edu> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I recently rewrote the Chat Sanitize and Chat Receiver blocks from the
> Tutorial module(Example 5) in C++. I did this because I wanted to add an
> acknowledgment feature into the blocks i
Hello All,
I recently rewrote the Chat Sanitize and Chat Receiver blocks from the
Tutorial module(Example 5) in C++. I did this because I wanted to add an
acknowledgment feature into the blocks in order to add some robustness to
it(I'm not sure yet if the chat example will lend itself to being rob
