On 17.06.2014 13:52, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
To me, the wrapping and passing of digital samples seems to put a
stack within the stack. The ends of the chain are unaware of the internal
message passing and act as if the samples were directly passed to the DAC
and ADC, ...
Yes, and ? These are un-r
> To me, the wrapping and passing of digital samples seems to put a
> stack within the stack. The ends of the chain are unaware of the internal
> message passing and act as if the samples were directly passed to the DAC
> and ADC, ...
Yes, and ? These are un-related stacks.
Some highend DAC/ADC h
Thanks for the quick replies. I can see how putting the SDR in a block
directly before the DAC or after the ADC is a PHY implementation, and how
this is the case when using embedded devices such as the E series USRPs and
the embedded SDR components in a base station.
My confusion is when gnuradi
On 17.06.2014 04:24, Michael Rahaim wrote:
I have a relatively high level question regarding gnuradio and software
radio in general. Is it a fair generalization to say that gnuradio is
operating at the application layer and is essentially emulating a
physical layer implementation (or the implemen
On 06/16/2014 10:24 PM, Michael Rahaim wrote:
Hi all,
I have a relatively high level question regarding gnuradio and
software radio in general. Is it a fair generalization to say that
gnuradio is operating at the application layer and is essentially
emulating a physical layer implementation (
Hi all,
I have a relatively high level question regarding gnuradio and software
radio in general. Is it a fair generalization to say that gnuradio is
operating at the application layer and is essentially emulating a physical
layer implementation (or the implementation of other lower layer
protocol
