Thursday, August 25, 2011 6:18 PM
> To: Wilson, Jeffery (DS-1); discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Extending UHD Device Support
>
>
>
> Jeffery,
>
> The first thing to keep in mind is that everything is GPL'ed (and
> specifically, *not* LGP
rce blocks other than picking apart the
current ones? If not, which block(s) would be a good starting
place?
Thanks!
-- Jeff
FROM: Matt Ettus
[mailto:m...@ettus.com]
SENT: Thursday, August 25, 2011 6:18 PM
TO:
Wilson, Jeffery (DS-1); discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
SUBJECT: Re:
[Discuss-gnuradio]
?
Thanks!
-- Jeff
From: Matt Ettus [mailto:m...@ettus.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 6:18 PM
To: Wilson, Jeffery (DS-1); discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Extending UHD Device Support
Jeffery,
The first thing to keep in mind is that everything is GPL'ed
Jeffery,
The first thing to keep in mind is that everything is GPL'ed (and
specifically, *not* LGPL). This means that if you use any UHD host code,
you must obey the GPL for EVERYTHING that links in. This goes all the way
up to your customer's application. This restriction already applies for G
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Wilson, Jeffery (DS-1)
wrote:
> Designation: Non-SSA/Finmeccanica
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We make several RF front-ends that we’d like to see supported in GNU Radio.
> Our initial idea is was to extend the Ettus UHD to include support for our
> devices, so that a wavef
Designation: Non-SSA/Finmeccanica
Hello,
We make several RF front-ends that we'd like to see supported in GNU
Radio. Our initial idea is was to extend the Ettus UHD to include
support for our devices, so that a waveform/flow graph using a UHD block
could run using either a USRP or one of our
