> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As always, there are lot of differences between processors.
> Some of the VIA's are dogs, other's aren't so bad. We've run
> the USRP and
> gmsk2 code on one particular compact VIA board, and it wasn't
> horrible.
> We were able to r
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:38:52PM -0500, Jim Hanlon wrote:
> I tried to get the USRP talking to an 800MHz VIA fanless industrial
> control computer, with expansion card to get USB 2.0 performance. I
> found that gnuradio installed and ran OK, but USRP performance
> consistently exhibited USB over
nsfers to/from the USB
> bus and your slowish CPU.
> HTH
> Jim Hanlon
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > g] On Behalf Of Lee Patton
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:19 PM
> > To: Eric Blossom
&
CTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> g] On Behalf Of Lee Patton
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:19 PM
> To: Eric Blossom
> Cc: Discuss gnuradio
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Embedded control of USRP
>
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:20 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> &
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:20 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > ... unless you're a glutton for punishment, don't get the Celeron
> > version, spend the extra bucks and get the Pentium M.
>
> Besides the dearth of on-board cache, what are th
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:20 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> ... unless you're a glutton for punishment, don't get the Celeron
> version, spend the extra bucks and get the Pentium M.
Besides the dearth of on-board cache, what are the other drawbacks of a
Celeron?
To fit the dimensional requirement I
> A couple of observations: no floating point
>> Have you tried the geode nx?
The MIT "$100 Laptop" uses the AMD Geode [EMAIL PROTECTED] See:
http://wiki.laptop.org/wiki/Hardware_specification
According to Jim Gettys, the reason is because it's the only low-power
processor they could find tha
Thanks, Chuck. Very useful to know.
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 15:34 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:22 -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
>
> > Also, did you consider the power consumption of the usrp? I don't know
> > if someone measured it, but this might also be a problem for you,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:33:26PM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> On 4/3/06, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> > > Hi Lee,
> > >
> > > We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> > > power
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:22 -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Also, did you consider the power consumption of the usrp? I don't know
> if someone measured it, but this might also be a problem for you,
> i.e., finding a battery which supports the usrp over a longer time.
>
I use a usrp with battery a
Hi Eric
On 4/3/06, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> > power constraints which will be difficult to meet. We are currently
> > looking at a
dio
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Embedded control of USRP
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:20:34 -0700
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:00:07PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Clark. Basically, the project we're working on
> involves putting the USRP on a small UAV ("A" as
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:22 -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> power constraints which will be difficult to meet. We are currently
> looking at a micro-atx solution with an amd geod nx processor since
> this one is compatib
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> power constraints which will be difficult to meet. We are currently
> looking at a micro-atx solution with an amd geod nx processor since
> this one is c
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:00:07PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Clark. Basically, the project we're working on
> involves putting the USRP on a small UAV ("A" as in "aerial" not
> "autonomous"). So, weight and power consumption are key. The hydraxc
> looks very cool. However
; I have a USRP and I've ordered a hydraxc. Let me know if you want to pursue
> > further. I don't have much time to throw at it, but I can at least try some
> > things out to gage how much work is involved.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Clark
> >
> >
>
I can at least try some
> things out to gage how much work is involved.
>
> Thanks,
> Clark
>
>
>
>
> >From: Lee Patton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> >Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Embedded control of USRP
> >Date: Sat, 0
Thanks very much for the reply, Pete. I believe I have been abusing the
terminology here. According to Wikipedia:
" An embedded system is a special-purpose computer system, which is
completely encapsulated by the device it controls. An embedded system
has specific requirements and performs pre-
Let me know if you want to pursue
further. I don't have much time to throw at it, but I can at least try some
things out to gage how much work is involved.
Thanks,
Clark
From: Lee Patton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Embedded control
I would like to control the USRP with a smaller embedded Linux computer
instead of a laptop. I've don't have any experience with this sort of
thing, and searching "embedded" in the mailing list archive didn't
return much. So, I was hoping some of you pros out there might be able
to point me in the
20 matches
Mail list logo
