Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > On 12/06/2011 06:02 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > >> >> Alright, good. Just making sure we didn't actually need the .la files. >> Which is good, since making them "correctly" (that is, identical to the >> output of autotools) could have been a r

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On 12/06/2011 06:02 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: Alright, good. Just making sure we didn't actually need the .la files. Which is good, since making them "correctly" (that is, identical to the output of autotools) could have been a real pain. Thanks! Tom Ok, "this evening" has arrived with a sicke

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Alexandru Csete wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Josh Blum wrote: >> >>> >> >>> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556 >>> >> >>> >> -josh >>> >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > >> >> >> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556 >> >> >> >> -josh >> >> >> >> >> >> Marcus, would you be up for trying that? The resulti

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > >> > http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556 > >> > >> -josh > >> > >> > >> Marcus, would you be up for trying that? The resulting la files do not > >> match what comes out of autotools. We d

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

>> >> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556 >> >> -josh >> >> >> Marcus, would you be up for trying that? The resulting la files do not >> match what comes out of autotools. We don't know if they will work, >> despite their differences, a

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Josh Blum > wrote: > > > > On 12/05/2011 05:30 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Marcus D. Leech > mailto:mle...@ripnet.com>> wrote: > > > >> I ran into a problem tonight when I tried to b

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > On 12/05/2011 05:30 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Marcus D. Leech > wrote: > > > >> I ran into a problem tonight when I tried to build gr-fcd -- it didn't > >> like the /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio*.la > >> file

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On 12/05/2011 05:30 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > >> I ran into a problem tonight when I tried to build gr-fcd -- it didn't >> like the /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio*.la >> files that some previous Gnu Radio build had left lying around. So, I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > I ran into a problem tonight when I tried to build gr-fcd -- it didn't > like the /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio*.la > files that some previous Gnu Radio build had left lying around. So, I > thought I'd do a make uninstall > make; sudo make

[Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds

I ran into a problem tonight when I tried to build gr-fcd -- it didn't like the /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio*.la files that some previous Gnu Radio build had left lying around. So, I thought I'd do a make uninstall make; sudo make install from the CMake side, and everything would be peachy. Wel