On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Rondeau <trondeau1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Josh Blum <j...@joshknows.com> wrote: > >> >> >> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556 >> >> >> >> -josh >> >> >> >> >> >> Marcus, would you be up for trying that? The resulting la files do not >> >> match what comes out of autotools. We don't know if they will work, >> >> despite their differences, and it'd be good to know. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> >> >> > Yeah, I'll give it a try tommorow evening sometime. Farking day job >> > gets in the way of all the >> > fun stuff :-( >> > >> >> This was fixed a month ago. Just clean your install. >> >> http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/473 >> >> -josh > > > I believe the problem is that he NEEDS the .la files for the gr-fcd > compilation. So either the gr-fcd would have to be worked on to link a > different way, or we would have to provide the .la files (and make sure > they are correct). > > Actually, gr-fcd can link against .so but apparently the autotools prefer .la if they are present. I had issue with the cmake generated .la file a month ago and Josh suggested to disable generation of .la files, see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2011-10/msg00512.html Alex
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
