On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Rondeau <trondeau1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Josh Blum <j...@joshknows.com> wrote:
>
>> >>
>> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556
>> >>
>> >>     -josh
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Marcus, would you be up for trying that? The resulting la files do not
>> >> match what comes out of autotools. We don't know if they will work,
>> >> despite their differences, and it'd be good to know.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >>
>> > Yeah, I'll give it a try tommorow evening sometime.  Farking day job
>> > gets in the way of all the
>> >   fun stuff :-(
>> >
>>
>> This was fixed a month ago. Just clean your install.
>>
>> http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/473
>>
>> -josh
>
>
> I believe the problem is that he NEEDS the .la files for the gr-fcd
> compilation. So either the gr-fcd would have to be worked on to link a
> different way, or we would have to provide the .la files (and make sure
> they are correct).
>
>
Actually, gr-fcd can link against .so but apparently the autotools prefer
.la if they are present.
I had issue with the cmake generated .la file a month ago and Josh
suggested to disable generation of .la files, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2011-10/msg00512.html

Alex
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to