Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Building USRP2 FPGA on ISE 11.4

2010-02-17 Thread Jared Casper
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Tracey Bernath wrote: > Nope, Nope, and Nope. I was rather shocked, things never go that well for me > :) > > I pulled the u2_rev3 and just resolved my way through the source tree. I was > not expecting it to generate cleanly. I did regenerate two cores as part of

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Building USRP2 FPGA on ISE 11.4

2010-02-15 Thread Tracey Bernath
Nope, Nope, and Nope. I was rather shocked, things never go that well for me :) I pulled the u2_rev3 and just resolved my way through the source tree. I was not expecting it to generate cleanly. I did regenerate two cores as part of the process, dumped a couple of the generated .v files because th

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Building USRP2 FPGA on ISE 11.4

2010-02-15 Thread Jeff Brower
Tracey- > I was able to place and route the design on ISE 11.4 using a 'high' effort > and ensuring that the speed grade selected is -5 (that really made a > difference of about 20MHz in the speed of the final design). However, when > it comes time to generate the bitstream, it complains about the

[Discuss-gnuradio] Building USRP2 FPGA on ISE 11.4

2010-02-15 Thread Tracey Bernath
I was able to place and route the design on ISE 11.4 using a 'high' effort and ensuring that the speed grade selected is -5 (that really made a difference of about 20MHz in the speed of the final design). However, when it comes time to generate the bitstream, it complains about the -g Match_cycle:A