ind out why the FPGA path was taken?
Thanks for your time and effort.
Tim Ansell
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
It would be really good if we could get another GNU Radio talk at this
miniconf.
Last year's talk was so popular that is was one of the conferences "Best
Of" and GNU Radio was even mentioned in one of the key note speeches.
Tim Ansell
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 18:48 +0200, Tim Anse
after you submit it. Most speakers will be notified soon after (or even
before) the 4th of December.
We hope to see both new and old faces and welcome everyone to come along
and make this Miniconf great!
Tim Ansell aka Mithro
Embedded Miniconf Organiser
_
so had the advantage of working over fibre optic
which gave even longer cable runs and isolation.)
I didn't think speed was really an issue.
Tim Ansell
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
So where do we request free samples from :P
The question is how would you get this into a computer? If we round it
up to 16 bits, it makes 4.6 Gigabytes per second. Would a FPGA even be
able to keep up? Could people a lot smarter then me, discuss how this
chip could even possibly be used?
Tim
Yes, the recording of Bdale's talk will be up shortly. (I will post to
this list when I have a URL.) Don't know the quality yet, but the sound
seems okay.
Thanks for producing such a cool project, and thanks Bdale for giving
the talk :P
Tim Ansell
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 11:05 -0600, Bd
