[Discuss-gnuradio] Run problems with latest UHD build

2011-01-22 Thread john
Ubuntu 10.4 I (intended) to pull over the latest GIT and did the usual procedure which has worked before i.e. cmake ../ make make test sudo make install however, when I run the GNURadio Companion as before, I now get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/john/lsb_tx_bpf.py", line 1

[Discuss-gnuradio] Number of TX/RX channels on a USRP

2011-01-22 Thread Arya Santini
Hi GNURadio, I'm new to the USRP and trying to understand the number of RF input/output channels available (USRP1). From the GNURadio wiki (http://gnuradio.org/redmine/wiki/gnuradio/UsrpFAQIntroMobo), I gather we have 4 possible TX and RX channels each, since we have 4 ADC's and 4 DAC's on the mot

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNURadio is disappointing [was: Greeting and a question]

2011-01-22 Thread Steve Mcmahon
Elvis Dowson: I don't agree with your criticism of Marcus. He has been EXTREMELY helpful to me, and has spent a lot of time helping many people on this list with GNU Radio/USRP issues for a long time. Let's all keep this list focused, respectful, and fair and unbiased. Steve McMahon --- On

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference

2011-01-22 Thread Patrik Tast
NOTICE that there is also a NOAA conference at Miami and I bet there will be SDR chatter. I have reserved tickets Quote: " The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), Office of Satellite Products and

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Patrik Tast
I was about to suggest the same. It is usual that a decayed satellite come alive again after passing sunlight (recharging). NOAA 9 is a good examle. Most likely to hear NanoSail is on the Southern Hemisphere at the moment(?) Patrik - Original Message - From: "Alexandru Csete" To

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference

2011-01-22 Thread Alexandru Csete
I think it's a great idea to have a GNU Radio conference and I'll do my best to be there. Personally, I also prefer an agenda with a good mixture of presentations and active sessions (tutorial/workshop/hacking), like the one proposed by Tom. September is fine and both weekdays and weekend are good.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Patrik Tast
Uhgh, That explains it Patrik - Original Message - From: "Philip Heron" To: Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 20:52 Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost! Hi, On 22/01/11 18:32, Patrik Tast wrote: Sumthing is fundamentally wrong how I/we do it. I gu

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Alexandru Csete
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: >> Hi Alex /Marcus & All >> >> I have exactly the same result as Alexandur (not only once) >> I guess we used almost the same RCP antenna >> http://www.poes-weather.com/~patrik/AO-51/ >> >> Yesterday nite NanoSail passed FI at zenith, I could

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Who actually *does* use GNU Radio?

2011-01-22 Thread Sanjay Singh
Thanks for pointing me Can you please dig down mails from Ettus paid employee mails for making same statements and remov ethem as well from the list... That would be fair... Also, wish all the best again. Am working with set of organizations and would bring all the people's knowledge on commo

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Hi Alex /Marcus & All I have exactly the same result as Alexandur (not only once) I guess we used almost the same RCP antenna http://www.poes-weather.com/~patrik/AO-51/ Yesterday nite NanoSail passed FI at zenith, I could not hear anything from it (once the signal jumped but staid only for <

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Philip Heron
Hi, On 22/01/11 18:32, Patrik Tast wrote: Sumthing is fundamentally wrong how I/we do it. I guess it could be LHCP? Perhaps someone (who speak English) could query NASA on howtos? I believe NanoSail-D's battery is now completely drained, and is now silent. -Phil _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Who actually *does* use GNU Radio?

2011-01-22 Thread Sanjay Singh
Hi Tom, I understand your concern. I agree with you. What about the people who sport so actively promoting Ettus Research products. I know they are paid by Ettus Research. But it doesn't mean they play spoil sport in building open source hardware platform. If GNURadio community feels am being mi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Patrik Tast
Hi Alex /Marcus & All I have exactly the same result as Alexandur (not only once) I guess we used almost the same RCP antenna http://www.poes-weather.com/~patrik/AO-51/ Yesterday nite NanoSail passed FI at zenith, I could not hear anything from it (once the signal jumped but staid only for <

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference

2011-01-22 Thread Douglas Geiger
As far as the timing is concerned, I would prefer during the week - but in which case something like Weds-Fri would work out very well for me. So count this as my hand being up as far as I can likely attend. In the meantime I'll see if I can't come up with something appropriate to present as well

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] some question about channelizer

2011-01-22 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:30 PM, James Jordan wrote: > Hi all, > what does oversample_rate means in pfb_channelizer_ccf and what is it for? > I see in channelizer implement it use FFT to despin the output data. What is > despin? > > Thanks Hi James, I answered that question in my previous email.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] hi all, can I use one RX receive a wideband signal and then seperate it to many narrowband signals

2011-01-22 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > On 01/20/2011 10:22 PM, James Jordan wrote: >> Marcus, Thanks for reply. >> That is make sense, so the point become how to convert the signal to >> baseband. > Oh, that's relatively easy--you multiply it with a complex signal at the > same

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference

2011-01-22 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jago Pearce wrote: > A very good idea. > > I recommend having a Google map where you can place markers (doesn't > have to be your real position). That way we can see where is most > central to host this. I'm in the UK for example. That might be a good idea for a f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio Conference

2011-01-22 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Ben Hilburn wrote: > A GNU Radio conference is an awesome idea, in my opinion, and I think > the September time-frame is a good one. > > I like points 1-5 a lot, and I'll second your idea of some sort of > hacking session. I've heard of companies/communities holdin

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP design is free

2011-01-22 Thread Moeller
On 22.01.2011 11:18, John Gilmore wrote: > I don't understand why people are complaining that the Ettus Research > board designs aren't free. They are free. Matt publicly announced > that he intended to release them under the GPL. Right up to this > day, the schematics (in PDF) are trivially do

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNURadio is disappointing [was: Greeting and a question]

2011-01-22 Thread Moeller
On 21.01.2011 10:19, Martin Braun wrote: > But all these open hardware threads seem to neglect that there's a > powerful *software* tool out there for real-time signal processing, and > a lot is happening at that end. GNU Radio is much more than the USRPs; > in fact, it's *not even* the USRPs. > I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP design is free

2011-01-22 Thread John Gilmore
> If you thought you bought a motherboard > from Ettus under the terms that you were getting schematics and PCB > files and blah blah blah, fine. If you didn't get them, point to the > line item on the receipt or the clause in the contract and take it up > with Ettus. I