Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Ubunto and GnuRadio, Lovely together

2006-03-06 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Monday 06 March 2006 08:14, Robert McGwier wrote: > Yes Matt, I know. I do love to install. Now if Altera would only > release their tools for Linux. They have, but they cost money :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice

[Discuss-gnuradio] Ubunto and GnuRadio, Lovely together

2006-03-06 Thread Robert McGwier
I am running gr on my new Ubunto installation on my Mini-ITX 'SDR machine'. Not one single build of a library was required. For those that do not know about it, Ubunto is a Debian derivative. It's package tool is apt and synaptic. This was completely trivial outside of one "wrapped around

[Discuss-gnuradio] Need help installing GNU Radio

2006-03-06 Thread jjw
Hello all, I am trying to install GNURadio on a Fedora Core 4 system following the instructions at http://www.kd7lmo.net/ground_gnuradio_install.html. I completed the baseline install process (skipping the two octave installs because I don't need them) and proceeded onto the gnu radio portion of

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP Update -- Daughterboard News March 2006!

2006-03-06 Thread Matt Ettus
> Why would somebody buy an LFRX or LFTX instead of a BasicRX or > BasicTX? Do they have an extra gain stage or other feature? Reasons you would want the LF boards: - The Basic boards don't work below about 1 MHz, and you have signals down to DC. One use would be for LF and VLF radio. Also, if

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization

2006-03-06 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:18:40PM -0500, David I. Emery wrote: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 12:03:33PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote: > > Good question. I've wanted to revisit it myself too. > > As I recall it was to reduce the spurs in the DDC output. > > If you get a chance, please see if you can find

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] frequency tuning word quantization

2006-03-06 Thread David I. Emery
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:53:44PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote: > > In the FPGA, the phase word (not the accumulator) is approximately > 15-bits wide. This gives worst case phase-truncation spurs of -90 dBc. > This looks small enough that we can safely ignore it. Therefore, > I suggest we stop tru