Ok, there a suspicious non-zero and equal link reset count for both
cases, can you elaborate on their nature please? Also it is worthy to
re-add interface and check connectivity again, it does not mean that
you`ll need to do same thing in production.
___
Yes, it is still visible.
root@node-6:~# ovs-vsctl list interface eth0 #without VF
_uuid : 16d4d75a-baf2-4613-baa5-c9a77d8720e2
admin_state : up
bfd : {}
bfd_status : {}
cfm_fault : []
cfm_fault_status: []
cfm_flap_count : []
cfm_he
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Dmitry Nikishov wrote:
> I've just tried installing ovs-switch 2.3.0 and ovs-common 2.3.0, so
> all the ovs packages versions are aligned. That didn't help: as long
> as VFs are disabled, it works fine, but not when they are enabled.
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:2
I've just tried installing ovs-switch 2.3.0 and ovs-common 2.3.0, so
all the ovs packages versions are aligned. That didn't help: as long
as VFs are disabled, it works fine, but not when they are enabled.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, D
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Dmitry Nikishov wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I'm trying to get OVS working with Intel 82599 and SR-IOV.
>
> Basically what I currently have is an Ubuntu 12.04 with custom kernel
> (3.14.23) and Intel 82599 NIC (eth0) and OVS 1.10 installed. There is
> also openvswitch-d
Hello all.
I'm trying to get OVS working with Intel 82599 and SR-IOV.
Basically what I currently have is an Ubuntu 12.04 with custom kernel
(3.14.23) and Intel 82599 NIC (eth0) and OVS 1.10 installed. There is
also openvswitch-datapath-dkms 2.3.0 which was built for 3.14.23.
There is a br-eth0 b
