I've just tried installing ovs-switch 2.3.0 and ovs-common 2.3.0, so all the ovs packages versions are aligned. That didn't help: as long as VFs are disabled, it works fine, but not when they are enabled.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Dmitry Nikishov <dnikis...@mirantis.com> > wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I'm trying to get OVS working with Intel 82599 and SR-IOV. >> >> Basically what I currently have is an Ubuntu 12.04 with custom kernel >> (3.14.23) and Intel 82599 NIC (eth0) and OVS 1.10 installed. There is >> also openvswitch-datapath-dkms 2.3.0 which was built for 3.14.23. >> >> There is a br-eth0 bridge in OVS, which is connected to eth0 >> interface. Bridge br-mgmt is connected to br-eth0 and is using VLAN >> tag 102. >> >> Network connectivity via br-mgmt -> br-eth0 -> eth0 chain work fine as >> long as 82599 Virtual Functions (VFs) are disabled. Once I enable at >> least 1 VF (echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:04:00.0/sriov_numvfs), >> server looses connectivity via this chain. If I try to set up VLAN 102 >> via ip link directly on eth0, it works. >> >> With the help of tcpdump I've found out that packets don't go any >> further than br-eth0. >> >> Software versions: >> Ubuntu 12.04 with custom kernel 3.14.23 >> openvswitch-switch 1.10.1+git20130823-0ubuntu3~cloud0 >> openvswitch-datapath-dkms 2.3.0 >> >> On Ubuntu 12.04 with 3.11.8-generic, same openvswitch-switch and >> openvswitch-datapath-dkms-lts-saucy there is no such issue. >> >> Any suggestions? Thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> discuss mailing list >> discuss@openvswitch.org >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > May be it is better to align dp and vswitch versions first, or try > against -saucy dp with same 3.14, if it is new enough to be built > against it. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
