again build error on openvswitch-kmod-rhel6.spec
old patch for CentOS 6.3 and ovs 1.7 not working
CentOS 6.4 x86_64 Minimal Install
2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.x86_64
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.x86_64
M=/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/openvswitch-1.9.0/_default/datapath/linux modules
make[1]
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:35:19PM +0400, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> Great! I will start testing network supported by OVS from right again
> (maybe more luck this time)
> NEWS blob is same...but before yesteday there where stated 1.10 version as
> well and now it end on post-1.9. Ok, whatever, it's
Great! I will start testing network supported by OVS from right again
(maybe more luck this time)
NEWS blob is same...but before yesteday there where stated 1.10 version as
well and now it end on post-1.9. Ok, whatever, it's not problem.
One small question:
Is it safe to download latest 1.9 releas
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:13:11PM +0400, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> I saw this announcement in February.
> But it's not on official page: http://openvswitch.org/download/
It's an oversight. I asked Justin (who usually does releases) to fix
it up.
> Also after day or NEWS pages were changed on gi
I saw this announcement in February.
But it's not on official page: http://openvswitch.org/download/
Also after day or NEWS pages were changed on gitweb: release dates from 1.9
were erased and 1.10 added.
Right now i see that NEWS changed again, again without release dates of 1.9
and 1.10 erased (c
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:31:42AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:29:09AM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> >> > Thanks you very much!
> >> > Following th
As it seen in their git-web 1.8 is just internal release.
Next release should be 1.9LTS and 1.10
They had to release 1.9 in February but something went wrong, so they
announced release of 1.10 as well.
So maybe someone of OVS crew can suggest release date for next LTS 1.9 or
1.10
Except recomp
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:29:09AM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
>> > Thanks you very much!
>> > Following this your steps helped me to get RPMs built.
>>
>> well done!
>> Never give u
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:29:09AM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> > Thanks you very much!
> > Following this your steps helped me to get RPMs built.
>
> well done!
> Never give up ;-)
> As these questions about CentOS 6.3 are coming mor
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> Thanks you very much!
> Following this your steps helped me to get RPMs built.
well done!
Never give up ;-)
As these questions about CentOS 6.3 are coming more frequently ...
what about putting a sort of FAQ on main webiste, even if it i
Thanks for your link as well.
But first of all: i don't want unofficial unstable release
And second thing is thet just i don't like to surrender, i want to get
this problem fixed even if this way is harder. principle...
Wish ovs bright feature, stable and "click-and-play install" releases :
On 23.10.2012 10:58 Denis Iskandarov said the following:
> I'm really trying to help developers and provided all details i had...
> when i was saying no luck, not working, didn't help means i have no new
> details compared to previous results...same erroronly random letters
> in /var/tmp/rpm-tm
I'm really trying to help developers and provided all details i had...
when i was saying no luck, not working, didn't help means i have no new
details compared to previous results...same erroronly random letters in
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LuOBSk
i'm not very good in linux internals and not some kind o
thanks a lot!
I will try to follow your steps tomorrow and update results status for sure ;)
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
>> Nope, your suggestion didn't work as well. (
>>
>
> you have to do some steps on a s
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> Nope, your suggestion didn't work as well. (
>
you have to do some steps on a system with Autoconf version 2.64 or higher
(CentOS 6.3 has
autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch
automake-1.11.1-1.2.el6.noarch
)
So, say you work in Fedora 17 in /tmp
On 10/22/2012 10:51 PM, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
Nope, your suggestion didn't work as well. (
Just a suggestion: You might want to provide the developers who are
reading this list with more information about what you exactly did and
what happened than only "don't remember exact command", "had
Nope, your suggestion didn't work as well. (
> I simple commended this lines in skbuff.h:
>
> /*
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3,2,0)
> static inline struct page *skb_frag_page(const skb_frag_t *frag)
> {
> return frag->page;
> }
> #endif
> */
> and it seems I recieved openwsitch.ko th
I simple commended this lines in skbuff.h:
/*
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3,2,0)
static inline struct page *skb_frag_page(const skb_frag_t *frag)
{
return frag->page;
}
#endif
*/
and it seems I recieved openwsitch.ko this way.
2012/10/22 Denis Iskandarov
> Can you please provide
Can you please provide me with command which applies patch?
I have tried patch .x .y .z (--dry-run) openswitch.patch (don't
remember exact command), but had no luck.
So I have have edited exact lines mentioned in patch by myself (added
removed modified) but it didn't help.
I think I'd better wait
On 22.10.2012 21:43 Denis Iskandarov said the following:
> Hello,
> I didn't found any other support forum for users so writing here.
> Sorry in advance.
> I'm very new to openvswitch but really want to integrate in my environment.
>
> First question: should it be such pain in a.. to install it on
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:43:07PM +0400, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> First question: should it be such pain in a.. to install it on system?
If it's difficult to install on CentOS 6.3, then it's because no one
has contributed instructions or patches to build easily on CentOS 6.3.
Feel free to contri
Hello,
it seems you didn't apply the patch
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-July/018906.html
you can follow the steps I took for 1.6.1 (and later for 1.7.1) in this thread:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2012-July/007739.html
(in particular the steps done are in message:
http://
22 matches
Mail list logo
