On 2015/7/1 22:57, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
As following topology, two VMs communicate via Vxlan tunnel.
TCP pkts may be droped for exceeding the mtu of host DPDK port in br2.
Now I can change the VMs' mtu from default to smaller to accommodate the
traffics, it works well.
The way I have not fin
On 2015/6/30 23:01, gowrishankar wrote:
On Thursday 25 June 2015 01:31 PM, Dongjun wrote:
As following topology, two VMs communicate via VXLAN tunnel.
TCP pkts may be droped for exceeding the MTU of host DPDK port in br2.
Now I can change the VMs' MTU from default to smaller to accomm
As following topology, two VMs communicate via Vxlan tunnel.
TCP pkts may be droped for exceeding the mtu of host DPDK port in br2.
Now I can change the VMs' mtu from default to smaller to accommodate the
traffics, it works well.
The way I have not find to change mtu of DPDK phy port, is there
As following topology, two VMs communicate via VXLAN tunnel.
TCP pkts may be droped for exceeding the MTU of host DPDK port in br2.
Now I can change the VMs' MTU from default to smaller to accommodate the
traffics, it works well.
The way I have not find to change mtu of DPDK phy port, is there
