On 2015/7/1 22:57, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
As following topology, two VMs communicate via Vxlan tunnel.
TCP pkts may be droped for exceeding the mtu of host DPDK port in br2.
Now I can change the VMs' mtu from default to smaller to accommodate the
traffics, it works well.
The way I have not fin
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:19:29AM +, Gray, Mark D wrote:
>> > I would like to highlight the release of a new version of TOIT to the
>> > vSwitch
>> > Characterization project in OPNFV.
>> >
>> A tool like this could help ensure that there is
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:19:29AM +, Gray, Mark D wrote:
> > I would like to highlight the release of a new version of TOIT to the
> > vSwitch
> > Characterization project in OPNFV.
> >
> A tool like this could help ensure that there is no unexpected degradation
> in performance. Perhaps it
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:48:12AM -0700, Xuemei Liu wrote:
> I want to generate forwarding rules for ovs, and need to get the port id
> (0, 1, ...) at the ovs from the port name (eth0, ...). I tried ovs-vsctl
> show, ovs-dpctl show, but they don't show the port id. Could anyone tell me
> the comm
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:59:14AM +, Abhijit Bhadra wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using ovs-ofctl to test addition/modification/deletion of OF 1.3 flows.
> I was using the following command to do the actions=mod_nw_tos for OF 1.0,
> ovs-ofctl add-flow tcp:10.130.177.160
> dl_vlan=128,in_port=12,table=
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:46:59PM +, O Mahony, Billy wrote:
> I am getting very surprising (to me at least) effects with the following
> flows installed.
>
> I am seeing packets forwarded when I expect them to be dropped and dropped
> when I expect them to be forwarded.
I'm trying to interp
One of the problems might be that after starting ovsdb-server
you should also start ovs-vswitchd. Please see INSTALL.DPDK.
Also, OVS 2.3 supports only DPDK 1.6. I would recommend to
take OVS from the git repository, branch-2.4 and use it with
DPDK 2.0.
On 30/06/2015 00:08, "Sundar Ramakrishnan"
>As following topology, two VMs communicate via Vxlan tunnel.
>TCP pkts may be droped for exceeding the mtu of host DPDK port in br2.
>Now I can change the VMs' mtu from default to smaller to accommodate the
>traffics, it works well.
>
>The way I have not find to change mtu of DPDK phy port, is the
>
> Hi Folks
>
> I would like to highlight the release of a new version of TOIT to the vSwitch
> Characterization project in OPNFV.
>
A tool like this could help ensure that there is no unexpected degradation
in performance. Perhaps it could be used to gate patches to prevent performance
drops o
Hi Folks
I would like to highlight the release of a new version of TOIT to the vSwitch
Characterization project in OPNFV.
TOIT was refactored to create a more generic framework that would allow for the
performance testing of multiple vSwitches.
**Refresh**: TOIT is an Apache licensed test fr
10 matches
Mail list logo