On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:17:04PM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Am I correct that Open vSwitch does not directly support static active/
> active bonding (what the Linux bonding driver calls mode 2)?
Not directly. You can implement something similar with OpenFlow flows.
Only OVS 2.4 supports OFPMT_TABLE_FEATURES.
OVS 1.3 and later support multiple flow tables.
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 08:00:44AM +0530, tech_kals Kals wrote:
> In your previous reply to this thread, you had mentioned that OVS 2.4 only
> will support multiple flow tables. Now, you mention that it i
Am I correct that Open vSwitch does not directly support static active/
active bonding (what the Linux bonding driver calls mode 2)?
Thanks!
--
Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
--
my ovs module was installed from
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-juno/epel-7/openvswitch-2.1.2-2.el7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
along with public Openstack package release.
Thanks,
-Fan
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Pravin Shelar"
> 发送时间: 2015-03-06 07:46:34 (星期五)
> 收件人: sea11...@ma
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your reply. I am planning to use OVS to inform the controller
about multiple flow support. Since any of the OVS versions are not
supporting Multiple flow tables support, could you please clarify my
doubts. Also, want to know if you share the details how OVS is going to
support m
"tc" configuration ? How do I check that ?
By OVS database I think qos and queue table is enough right ?
queue and qos tables: http://pastebin.com/2kwSAeig
[Forgot to cc mailings lists]
Regards,
Nuno B.
De: Ben Pfaff
Enviado: 6 de março de 2015 22:24
Par
Thanks.
What configuration does "tc" report for queues? What is in your OVS
database?
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:19:58PM +, Rui Braz wrote:
> You're right, i forgot to add it, sorry.
> Logs: http://pastebin.com/Sk2EQSNy
>
> Regards,
> Nuno B.
>
> De
You're right, i forgot to add it, sorry.
Logs: http://pastebin.com/Sk2EQSNy
Regards,
Nuno B.
De: Ben Pfaff
Enviado: 6 de março de 2015 22:15
Para: Rui Braz
Cc: mininet-disc...@lists.stanford.edu; discuss@openvswitch.org
Assunto: Re: [ovs-discuss] Queue ad
We're having a communication problem. I keep asking for logs and you
keep not giving me logs. When you give me logs, I can start helping
again.
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:11:39PM +, Rui Braz wrote:
> I've restarted the daemon. I saw the logs being stored elsewhere, with the
> correct versio
I've restarted the daemon. I saw the logs being stored elsewhere, with the
correct version. The queue is inserted and how many packets passed through it.
However the command 'sudo ovs-ofctl queue-get-config s1 s1-eth2
' gives me the output
'queue 0:
However as you may see the actions I did in mi
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:18:29PM +0530, tech_kals Kals wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I am planning to use OVS to inform the controller
> about multiple flow support. Since any of the OVS versions are not
> supporting Multiple flow tables support, could you please clarify my
> doubts. Also, want
OK.
I don't know how to help without the log. I guess you'll have to
figure out what's going on there first.
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:47:02PM +, Rui Braz wrote:
> I don't need to start it, I just launch the topology. I think mininet vm
> already has scripts to launch it at boot. However a
I don't need to start it, I just launch the topology. I think mininet vm
already has scripts to launch it at boot. However after I start the VM i
checked the processes that are running and i got this:
http://pastebin.com/13bYMN3K
Logs seem to be being saved in the same place according to this e
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:42:12PM -0600, Cheng Jin wrote:
> > Attached please find the log file. Thanks for your time and help.
>
> Thanks. I'm adding back the mailing list to continue the discussion.
>
> Consider 00:00:00:00:00:02 in bridge s
Hi everyone,
Thanks a lot for taking care of this issue!
> This is a good point. I suspect there is a loop in the setup causing the
> bounch-back.
Yes, this really looks like that there is a loop somewhere.
> > I cannot yet reconcile this with the previous message of the sending
> > VM receivi
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 7:38 PM
> To: Gray, Mark D
> Cc: swair shah; discuss@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] packet reorderoing
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:08:03PM +, Gray, Mark D wrote:
> > > Fro
16 matches
Mail list logo
