于 2014年11月06日 00:08, Jesse Gross 写道:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:03 PM, FengYu LeiDian
wrote:
Hi
Env: redhat 6.4, OpenvSwitch-2.1.2, using native
datapath/linux/openvswitch.ko module
VM1 on host1, VM2 on host2, host1 and host2 are connected by a switch.
both VM enable virtio/vhost when launchin
The other issue was in the same file. I am glad make check catches these
issues and hope there are none in other files. I attached a patch that
should make it simpler to extend the union in the future.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Madhu Challa
wrote:
> This test was failing because
Hi
Vxlan tunnel based on udp, (TSO support offloads for tcp, NIC support
in default).
in the case of case2 , this is entirely normal performance for standard
ovs2.1.2
Only if you can make essential performance optimization.
zhangguanghui 10102
From: di
This test was failing because of an assumption in the code on its size.
diff --git a/lib/learn.c b/lib/learn.c
index e93015c..aa4fc45 100644
--- a/lib/learn.c
+++ b/lib/learn.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ learn_parse_load_immediate(const char *s, struct
ofpact_lear
}
s = arrow;
} el
Thanks Ben. I will debug and get back to you. I will check with Jesse in
the upcoming ovs conference if he has other thoughts on implementing this.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:10:59PM -0800, Madhu Challa wrote:
> > I was playing increasi
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:59:30PM +0100, Martin Vizvary wrote:
> does anybody know if and how is implemented passive timeout for flow
> expiration?
>
> I was playing around with it, but you can configure only active timeout.
> (passive timeout is approximately 1s - I guess it is connected with
>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:10:59PM -0800, Madhu Challa wrote:
> I was playing increasing the size of these structures to be able to read
> Geneve metadata. Currently they are limited to 16 bytes. I noticed that
> some of the test cases fail when I do this. I guess I can read the oxms
> directly wit
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:03 PM, FengYu LeiDian
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Env: redhat 6.4, OpenvSwitch-2.1.2, using native
> datapath/linux/openvswitch.ko module
>
> VM1 on host1, VM2 on host2, host1 and host2 are connected by a switch.
> both VM enable virtio/vhost when launching VM
>
> case1:
> VM -> tap
I'm trying to delete a "dpdk" type port and add it again.
I start vswitchd with DPDK argumentsand create a bridge with datapath_type
"netdev" .
. /vswitchd/ovs-vswitchd --dpdk -c 0x2 -n 4 --socket-mem 4096,0
-- unix:/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock --pidfile --log-file -de
Hi,
For why I have to build openvswitch-kmod,
I think it is from spec under rhel/openvswitch.spec
...
Requires: openvswitch-kmod, logrotate, python
...
I read spec from Fedora source rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/o/openvswitch-2.3.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
Hi,
I followed your way and can build kernal succ.
Seemed that important step is we need run boot.sh again.
I found after run this step, all errors changed to warning so build
passed.
I think as rhel 7 has been out for some time, although only a few product
switch to 7.0.
It will better to pr
I have to do step by step for QOS lab on website(openvswitch.org)
http://openvswitch.org/support/config-cookbooks/qos-rate-limiting . But
when I test result after complete configuration of openvswitch. I faced a
more difference than result on web site.
When I test on VM, bandwidth do not limited. B
Below
Thanks
From: Flavio Leitner
To: Gang U Xu/China/IBM@IBMCN
Cc: Alex Wang , b...@openvswitch.org
Date: 2014/10/31 21:33
Subject:Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs 2.3 kernel module build failed on
rhel 7.0 GA
Hi Gang,
I've tried 2.3 with that fix on 3.10.0-123.8.1.
See my ste
Yes, In fact, I reboot the whole system after I upgrade kernel.
Below for your reference
[root@vs260 ~]# rpm -qa | grep kernel-
kernel-tools-3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64
kernel-devel-3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
kernel-devel-3.10.0-123.el7.
Hi all,
In fact, I really boot my build node after upgrade kernel.
I did some investigation
1. For below error:
In file included from
/home/xugang/tmp3/ovs-2.3/BUILD/openvswitch-2.3.0/_default/../datapath/linux/compat/include/net/gre.h:10:0,
from
/home/xugang/tmp3/ovs-2.3/BUIL
Hi all,
Thanks your quick support first!
I did below
1. Update kernel to 3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64
2. I cherry-pick 4ae2b2c1c4c345d0cb5f5a6b0f20fd6afb4a6962 from branch 2.3,
then generate one patch
3. After install patch, build again, the problem skb_zerocopy solved now,
but still failed for be
Hi,
does anybody know if and how is implemented passive timeout for flow
expiration?
I was playing around with it, but you can configure only active timeout.
(passive timeout is approximately 1s - I guess it is connected with
next_timeout cycle only...
Martin
--
Mgr. Martin Vizvary
If the fields you are adding are for a tunnel, and flow extraction will
look beyond the tunnel header into the encapsulated packet, then I
recommend adding your fields to struct flow_tnl--it will make the
remaining changes easier. Otherwise, they probably should not be in
flow_tnl.
On Wed, Nov 05
[Adding ovs-discuss as others may find it useful, I hope you don't mind.]
Yes, my patch is doing the same. But be aware that 'ovs-docker' is
just a very simple script that adds an interface into the container
after it is created. So you will need some mechanism inside the
container to prevent the
Hi Ben,
Thanks. Looking at struct flow I see the structure flow_tnl. Should
matching fields of the GTP header be declared in here or directly as
members of the flow struct?
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 07:42:36PM +0100, Dani Camps wro
20 matches
Mail list logo
