On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:14:05PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > Speaking on how ports works and limits, I've heard about an interesting
> > problem when using containers. If you add more than 1k containers to
> > an OVS bridge, the n
Hello,
any ideas why this is not working? Am I in the wrong newsgroup?
I want to use ovs also on my proxmox system and if such a simple thing is
not working I am not sure if I can use ovs for that!
Regards
Manfred
Von: discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] Im Auftrag
Hi Friends,
I got a failure when compiling openvswitch-2.1.2 on Yocto.
Here are my environment information and log. It seems no specific reason is
provided. Anyone encounter the same error?
Please help. Thanks in advance.
LSB Version:
:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.
Hello everyone,
I use the tc and ovs to controll my traffic, and I find they can
all controll the traffic, but I want to compare the "CPU power
consumption", so I use the "top" command. As a result , here is my
comparison:
tc in eth0, 30mbits bandwidth:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CP
Answering my own (inane) question. The kvm command I specified below works
except that i just needed to point the tap scripts it to br0 directly and
let it create the tap devices on the bridge. two VMs on that bridge can
ping each other. up next is how to create a logical switch between VMs on
diff
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Sam Hague wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why is an arp drop rule added in the datapath when two bridges are connected
> via a flow-based tunnel and both bridges are on the same host?
>
> In the example picture I am attempting a ping from the client to the ws1.
> Two bridges, sff
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:49:30PM -0700, Srini Seetharaman wrote:
> Thanks Ben.
>
> > It isn't currently supported. The actions in groups are OpenFlow
> > "action sets", which means that they are executed in a specific order
> > defined by the OpenFlow spec regardless of the order in which the
>
Hi,
why is an arp drop rule added in the datapath when two bridges are
connected via a flow-based tunnel and both bridges are on the same host?
In the example picture I am attempting a ping from the client to the ws1.
Two bridges, sff1 and 2, ports listed also. Flows programmed are below the
pict
Thanks Ben.
> It isn't currently supported. The actions in groups are OpenFlow
> "action sets", which means that they are executed in a specific order
> defined by the OpenFlow spec regardless of the order in which the
> actions are actually specified. We haven't yet defined where
> "resubmit" s
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:37:30AM -0700, Srini Seetharaman wrote:
> Hi, I seem to have some trouble using resubmit action within a group
> action. Am I doing something wrong, or is this not supported?
It isn't currently supported. The actions in groups are OpenFlow
"action sets", which means tha
Hi, I seem to have some trouble using resubmit action within a group
action. Am I doing something wrong, or is this not supported?
I installed rules as follows and did a test to see if the bucket action is
applied. But, didn't see that work. At the least, If it is not supported,
I'd have to like t
11 matches
Mail list logo
