Re: [ovs-discuss] How can this work with out _dst ?

2013-05-20 Thread kevin parker
Thank You Ben for the detailed description,but my issue is everything is working :) .I hope it shouldn't work so that i can troubleshoot the issue. The only thing i am not able to understand is how packets are reaching my vm with out *nw_dst* and *dl_dst*. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Ben Pf

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can this work with out _dst ?

2013-05-20 Thread Ben Pfaff
Same procedure, except that you have to instead figure out where you think it should be dropped and was not. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:26:55AM +0530, kevin parker wrote: > Thank You Ben for the detailed description,but my issue is everything is > working :) .I hope it shouldn't work so that i can

Re: [ovs-discuss] Behaving differently with same flow but in different methods.

2013-05-20 Thread ananthan
Ok, How about this,Why do we need *nw_dst* and *dl_dst* as packets can reach destination with out being dropped by default drop rule.ie *in_port=2 actions=drop.*Hope my question is clear,in my case with out nw_dst and dl_dst packets everything is working. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Jesse Gr

Re: [ovs-discuss] Relation between ofport and interface number?

2013-05-20 Thread Jesse Gross
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:29:15AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Christopher Paggen (cpaggen) >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > >> > >> > I’m wondering if/how I can establish a relation between an OVS interface >> >

Re: [ovs-discuss] Relation between ofport and interface number?

2013-05-20 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:29:15AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Christopher Paggen (cpaggen) > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I’m wondering if/how I can establish a relation between an OVS interface > > (such as vnet0) and its port number as used in openflow entr

Re: [ovs-discuss] Behaving differently with same flow but in different methods.

2013-05-20 Thread Jesse Gross
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:40 AM, ananthan wrote: > > Could you tell me how can this flow work with out nw_dstand dl_dst? > > 1.priority=400,arp,in_port=2,dl_src=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a,nw_src=5.x.x.12,arp_sha=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a > actions=NORMAL > > 2.priority=399,ip,in_port=2,dl_src=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a,nw

Re: [ovs-discuss] Adding a new vlan will caused the host lost connection

2013-05-20 Thread Jesse Gross
There's an extensive section in the FAQ about vlans that I would recommend reading. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Kris zhang wrote: > No, so you mean it maybe not caused by vlan splinters? > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Jesse Gross wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Kris z

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can this work with out _dst ?

2013-05-20 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 02:47:50PM +0530, kevin parker wrote: > Can some one please say how this work? > > 1.priority=400,arp,in_port=2,dl_src=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a,nw_src=5.x.x.12,arp_sha=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a > actions=NORMAL > > 2.priority=399,ip,in_port=2,dl_src=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a,nw_src=5.x.x.12 > ac

Re: [ovs-discuss] OpenFlow Table feature support

2013-05-20 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:55:44AM +, NS Srinivasa Murthy-B37840 wrote: > Is Open flow defined Table features support (OFPMP_TABLE_FEATURES) > provided in OVS? If so please let me know the version. No. We will accept a contribution, if you have one to offer. __

Re: [ovs-discuss] Behaving differently with same flow but in different methods.

2013-05-20 Thread ananthan
Could you tell me how can this flow work with out *nw_dst*and *dl_dst?* 1.priority=400,arp,in_port=2,dl_src=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a,nw_src=5.x.x.12,arp_sha=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a actions=NORMAL 2.priority=399,ip,in_port=2,dl_src=6a:3b:ad:97:c9:8a,nw_src=5.x.x.12 actions=NORMAL 3.priority=398,in_port=2 act

Re: [ovs-discuss] Adding a new vlan will caused the host lost connection

2013-05-20 Thread Kris zhang
No, so you mean it maybe not caused by vlan splinters? On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Kris zhang wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I use ovs-1.7.1, and i run ovs on a single NIC host (CentOS): > > > > # ovs-vsctl add-br br0 > > # ovs-vsctl add

Re: [ovs-discuss] Network get unstable, put the whole system on halt

2013-05-20 Thread Jesse Gross
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Salman Toor wrote: > Hi, > > We are using openvswitch with Openstack Quantum module. Following are the > details of our system.. > > Openstack Controller and Compute nodes are running with Ubuntu 12.04.5, > kernel 3.5 and OpenVSwitch version 1.4.0+build0 with GRE t

Re: [ovs-discuss] Adding a new vlan will caused the host lost connection

2013-05-20 Thread Jesse Gross
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Kris zhang wrote: > Hi guys, > > I use ovs-1.7.1, and i run ovs on a single NIC host (CentOS): > > # ovs-vsctl add-br br0 > # ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0 > > Then i setup the eth0 interface's other_config: > enable-vlan-splinters="true". > > Last I ping this host b

[ovs-discuss] Adding a new vlan will caused the host lost connection

2013-05-20 Thread Kris zhang
Hi guys, I use ovs-1.7.1, and i run ovs on a single NIC host (CentOS): # ovs-vsctl add-br br0 # ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0 Then i setup the eth0 interface's other_config: enable-vlan-splinters="true". Last I ping this host by another PC, and at same time i do this: # ovs-vsctl add-port taptes

[ovs-discuss] Network get unstable, put the whole system on halt

2013-05-20 Thread Salman Toor
Hi, We are using openvswitch with Openstack Quantum module. Following are the details of our system.. Openstack Controller and Compute nodes are running with Ubuntu 12.04.5, kernel 3.5 and OpenVSwitch version 1.4.0+build0 with GRE tunnels. The problem is with very little activity everythin