On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:25:17AM +0530, Ramana Reddy wrote:
> This is the post from jesse regarding GRE tunnels in OVS mailing list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@openvswitch.org/msg00360.html
>
> I replicated the same steps here for both tunnel1 and tunnel2:
>
> *tunnel1:*
>
> # ovs-v
This is the post from jesse regarding GRE tunnels in OVS mailing list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@openvswitch.org/msg00360.html
I replicated the same steps here for both tunnel1 and tunnel2:
*tunnel1:*
# ovs-vsctl create interface name=tunnel1 type gre options:remote_ip
=x.x.x.x
# ovs-
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:29:45PM +0530, Ramana Reddy wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply. Yaa its work if I set a GRE tunnel "tunnel1"
> from
> VM1 to OpenVswitch( External) /Linux Machine and "tunnel2" from VM2 to
> OpenVswitch(External)/Linux Machine.
> In this setup, the OpenVswitch (External
Hi Ben Pfaff,
Thanks for your quick reply. Yaa its work if I set a GRE tunnel "tunnel1"
from
VM1 to OpenVswitch( External) /Linux Machine and "tunnel2" from VM2 to
OpenVswitch(External)/Linux Machine.
In this setup, the OpenVswitch (External) creating two data paths dp0 and
dp1 as each tunnel requi
Dear All,
Sorry for spamming your inbox.
A small correction in my last post:
I need the traffic generated from VM1-> VM2 should travel the following
path:
VM1 -> OpenVswitch1 -> OpenVswitch2->OpenSwitch1-> VM2.
(and all are on the same subnet).
+---+ +---+
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:28:31PM +0530, Ramana Reddy wrote:
> Hi Everyone, This is my set up.
It's a little hard to see. I think you must have made it with a
proportional font or a tab width different from mine.
> VM1 and VM2 are running on Host machine. According the paper "Extending
> Networ
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:38:20PM +0200, Любомир Йотов wrote:
> So far I can create the VMs and start some services on them but my
> problem is that I cannot add the VLANs to the VMs. I want ot be able
> to add and remove VLANs in VM3 without stopping the network service to
> the already working V
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Madko wrote:
> lookups: frags:0, hit:332572398, missed:39405270, lost:390
>
> Can you explain what means the "lookups" line, we don't find anything
> in the man pages, especially the "missed" and "lost" value. Thank you.
frags:0 means that no IP fra
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:11:16PM +, Haris Rotsos wrote:
> Following your answer, the insertion of exact match rules in the
> classifier table doesn't have an impact on the switching performance
> and is the default behaviour expected from openvswitch?
(Is that what you were really asking abo
On Dec 16, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Haris Rotsos wrote:
> Following your answer, the insertion of exact match rules in the
> classifier table doesn't have an impact on the switching performance
> and is the default behaviour expected from openvswitch?
Correct. Plus, the kernel module only stores exact-
Dear Ben,
thanks a lot for your quick answer.
Following your answer, the insertion of exact match rules in the
classifier table doesn't have an impact on the switching performance
and is the default behaviour expected from openvswitch?
The linear search mode for the classifier table, was only a
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Haris Rotsos wrote:
> I noticed using ovs-ofctl that openvswitch has 2 tables : hash with
> wildcard 0x00 and classifier with wildcard 0x3f. My
> understanding is that the first table is used for exact matches flows,
> while the second is used for wilcarded
Hello everybody,
I am currently using openvswitch as an openflow switch and nox as the
controller, within which which I am writting a test module in python.
The module inserts a few exact match flows in the openflow switch.
I noticed using ovs-ofctl that openvswitch has 2 tables : hash with
wildc
Hi Everyone, This is my set up.
+-+ +---+
| VM1 | | VM2 |
+ + +---+
| |
+ - | -- --- | -
14 matches
Mail list logo
