Jeremy Charles wrote:
> I'd like to hear from those who have had to manage IT resources for offices
> that are located on opposite sides of oceans.
>
> Our primary challenge right now is this: Our original offices, and our CIFS
> file servers, are located in Wisconsin, USA. We also have an of
Rob Cherry wrote:
> Has anyone ever used unison? (http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/)
>
> I have a large file server migration coming up (large being relative -
> its only .5Tb - but large for us). We are migrating to a new domain
> infrastructure. As such all the SIDs and ownership of f
Does anyone have recommendations on running Splunk under Xen?
http://www.splunk.com/base/Documentation/latest/installation/SystemRequirements
says "Note: Running Splunk in virtual machine (VM) mode on any platform
will degrade performance." and the recommended hardware config is at
least: 2x qu
peg your processors nicely to boot. I wouldn't recommend running Splunk
> in a virtualized environment for anything other than integration testing
> or else if you are processing the lightest of loads.
>
> Cheers,
> - --Trey
>
> Quoth Ryan Pugatch [01/14/2010 07:46 PM]
Hello all,
I currently have 32 Windows XP machines virtualized on a CentOS machine
under Xen. They're used for testing websites under IE (and are accessed
via RDP). Unfortunately, I have been having horrible performance issues
with Windows XP under Xen. I've emailed the centos-virt list to s
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>
> I find that Xen is great for virtualization of linux inside of linux ... And
> for nothing else. In fact, whenever I have a non-linux guest inside of Xen,
> I find Xen is unstable. I have a server with windows & linux guests inside
> of xen on RHEL5 host ... and abou
Joshua Penix wrote:
>
> If you haven't already, give the GPLPV ("ParaVirt") drivers for XP a quick
> try. They're supposed to help network and disk performance significantly:
>
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenWindowsGplPv
>
>> What I'm hoping to find out from people on this list is othe
;
> -Original Message-
> From: discuss-boun...@lopsa.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lopsa.org] On
> Behalf Of Ryan Pugatch
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:42 PM
> To: discuss@lopsa.org; blu
> Subject: [lopsa-discuss] virtualizing XP under Linux and remote IE
>
.com/products/server/
>
>
>
> I've successfully used it to virtualize WinXP systems in the past,
> specifically for Mac web developers to test on, actually. It has a
> pretty nifty web management interface.
>
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Ryan
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> VMWare Server is a terrible product. I wouldn't recommend it for any
> purpose.
>
> Perhaps you should look at ESXi? Does the host need to be Linux, or perhaps
> bare metal would be ok?
>
Yeah, I have been leaning toward ESXi. No problem with that since I can
loa
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Yeah, I have been leaning toward ESXi. No problem with that since I
>> can
>> load OpenManage in it which lets me manage the RAID, etc.
>
> If you can load OpenManage on ESXi, please tell me how. That is something I
> would desperately love to do, but as far as I know
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> For the moment, I am not asking you what you think is good policy.
>
>
>
> For the moment, I am only asking for feedback on my intended style, to
> introduce policy in an organization that formerly had none.
>
>
>
I think that asking the 'general public' to help
Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
> Education only goes so far. You still need the policy. In fact the two
> go hand in hand. There should be a policy, with the education on why
> the policy exists and how to follow the policy.
>
> In the end, you will need something to enforce. You always end up
Hi,
Anyone using a Compellent SAN? Especially interested for those using it
for data warehousing/MS SQL Server.
Thanks.
-Ryan
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the Leagu
On 7/6/10 9:48 PM, Adam Levin wrote:
> We have one in our lab with about 50TB of storage on it right now (four
> shelves, and I believe the breakdown is 1 shelf each of 450GB 15k FC,
> 300GB 15k FC, 500GB 7200rpm SATA and 1TB 7200rpm SATA, but I could be
> off). We purchased two shelves initially,
15 matches
Mail list logo
