On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 01:19 -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Frankly, I've heard much worse comments on campus, told by people with
> far less consideration of who might happen to be standing around nearby.
>
> If upper management wants to gun for someone who's been criticizing them
> for their stup
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:31 -0500, rac...@mcs.anl.gov wrote:
> If I know that that "root" shouldn't be the root password,
> what prevents me from setting it to abc123?It's just
> as bad, but that wasn't the question on the test, so is it ok?
Damn, now I need to change my password...
and the co
I put in Packeteer PacketShapers (now BlueCoat PacketShapers).
With a policy/proceedure for adding business required external hosted
applications/web sites.
Everything else dropped into a general use category, except for
streaming media.
The big thing is that without shaping, you get bad performa
Atom Powers wrote:
[snip]
> Hardware Load Balancers that I have heard about:
> Netscaler
> F5
> KEMP
Brocade's ServerIron
Cisco ACE
ServerIron is supposedly pretty good.
No idea about Cisco ACE.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.or
Brad Knowles wrote:
> One thing that both of these have in common is that they are primarily
> designed to deal with HTTP and HTTPS, and don't do so well on other
> protocols. We ended up creating a trivial "web page" that could be
> monitored by the load balancing switches, and we would have s
Dave Close wrote:
> We should just accept that a universal identifier is not practical, and
> perhaps not desireable.
Let's just assign everyone an IPv6 address and be done with it... :P
:::::::
--
END OF LINE
--MCP
Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> When you think about it, the id has to be unique within a specific domain,
> within a specific company. Well, most companies have a unique staff id which
> typically isn't confidential (you can't get access to anything confidential,
> with just that id). Why not use that ?
Tracy Reed wrote:
>> The proper way to do it (Plan A) is to use keys only, but ensure
>> your keys are themselves protected by password.
>
> Ensure how? I think making it clear that creating an unencrypted key
> is a firing offense is good enough but others disagree and insist on
> technical measu
seph wrote:
> Tracy Reed writes:
>
>> I really want to avoid having to purchase proprietary SecureID
>> tokens. Anyone have reasonably priced PKI tokens they are using that
>> work well with Linux?
>
> My auditor mentioned that openvpn can meet the 2 factor requirement. It
> can be configured to
Brian Mathis wrote:
> As much as I like Cory Doctorow, you should instead read the Ars
> Technica version
> (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/02/school-under-fire-for-spying-on-kid-via-webcam-at-home.ars)
>
> where they actually tried to do a little bit of journalism. They point
>
Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>
>> If we only cared about the client/server model, IPv4 and NAT would be just
>> fine, now and for decades to come. The real value-add of IPv6 is peer to
>> peer. But in order for that to be logistically possible, a client n
unix_fan wrote:
> 5. Travel, part 3 - danger bonus: If work involves travel to a State
> Department declared combat zone, there are typically significant
> bonuses applied. Hint: the list is small - don't assume that car
> bombs, armed conflict, or anti-American demonstrations every Friday
> mean t
WHAAAT is your favorite editor?
EMACs
no!
vi!
AAAHH
On 05/06/10 12:25, Brian Mathis wrote:
> Please don't start a "which VCS is better even though I know it's git"
> war. All we need to talk about are which options are out there, which
> I believe we have already done, and t
Doug Hughes wrote:
> Jonathan B Bayer wrote:
[snip]
>> Each virtual system will have a relatively small partition to boot
>> from. The data partition (/var) will be accessed via either NFS or
>> CIFS. The exported filesystems will be on the CentOS server, and
>> exported to each individual virtua
Example of the "Master of all trades" that I have been seeing, since the
economic down turn...
--
Location: San Mateo, CA
Area Code: 650
Tax Term: CON_HIRE_CORP CON_HIRE_IND CON_HIRE_W2
Pay Rate: Market
Length: 3-4 Months
Position ID: 945212
Dice ID: hcg
Tr
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
> * The distributed nature of hg encourages frequent checkins to
>your local repository without impacting users pulling from
>a "central" repo.
>
> * When you're ready to share your changes with others, you can
>either push to a "central" repo or tell te
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> The reason why I'm unwilling to simply choose a policy as I see fit, and
> cram it down their throats, is because I expect compliance without using
> punishment as the motivation factor. This necessitates that people feel
> some voluntary commitment and understanding of
Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between those
> guys, or even one including commercial products?
Here is the configuration management panel from Open Source Bridge 2009.
- Luke Kanies from Reductive Labs for Puppet
- Brendan Strejcek of Cfengine
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
> So, here's what I propose to you as a solution:
>
> Rather than writing out a long list of rules, regulations, etc that your
> employees will ignore, focus instead on education.
>
> Example:
>
> Policy: Your password must be at least 8 characters long and include
> let
Brian Mathis wrote:
> Providing reasoning and explanation is a good thing, but you also need
> to be careful of getting into a discussion or debate. When conveying
> the policies, people need to know that these are the policies, here's
> why, and that's how it is. You are providing reasoning to g
Doug Hughes wrote:
> Adam Moskowitz wrote:
>> Does anyone know of other tools that will let me populate an EXT2 image
>> file, again, *WITHOUT* mounting the file?
> Oh, definitely take a look at knoppix and/or unionfs. It does what I
> think you are looking for. It works with an original ISO and
Luke S Crawford wrote:
> There is an alternative. It's contract to hire. If you are worth
> me wasting a few hours talking to you, you are worth me paying you for
> a day or two of work. (and, after that, if you seem okay, a week or a
> month worth of work. If it turns out you aren't any good,
On 06/25/10 13:52, Chuong Dao wrote:
> Not really. I just thought it would be nice to manage one single cert for all
> nodes. I guess I am just being lazy.
> I'll look into F5, Kemp, and Barracuda. Cisco is overkill right now. Nice to
> know people are still using LVS. Have a nice weekend, all.
23 matches
Mail list logo
