Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> When you think about it, the id has to be unique within a specific domain,
> within a specific company. Well, most companies have a unique staff id which
> typically isn't confidential (you can't get access to anything confidential,
> with just that id). Why not use that ? s0032456 isn't as nice as Jane.Doh,
> but it works well. Nobody remembers email addresses, or try to guess them
> (is it Don, Donals, Steven, Stephen, Steve ?), we typically write them down,
> until we can type them and add them to our directory, so the non-intuitive
> nature of s0032456 shouldn't be a problem.
>
ooo... compuserv addresses... :)
--
END OF LINE
--MCP
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
