> On Feb 10, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
>
>
> On 2/10/2015 1:01 PM, Gilbert Wilson wrote:
> > Selling it as a membership based organization that has benefits is,
> > and always has been, based on the promise of some sort of undefined
> > future return. It’s
Well sorta. That's only because the conservative posture we've taken due to
financial risk. The idea is to spend more on program than operations/admin.
Uhhh maybe that's the wrong choice of words for an audience of sysadmins but
hopefully you know what I mean. :-)
Anyway you'll see that change
On 2015-02-10 14:46, Steve VanDevender wrote:
> Craig Constantine writes:
> > just to save everyone the trouble...
> >
> > I just glanced through the recent meeting minutes over on
> > Governance. (which is very handy!) But I don't see any particular
> > finance-type reports that would answer
bam! That answers my level of curiousity. Thanks Matt,
-- Craig Constantine, http://constantine.name
On Feb 10, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Matt Disney wrote:
Annually: Dues constitute about $40K income. Fixed expenses are about $10K.
Then we have various program expenses including communications,
pro
Annually: Dues constitute about $40K income. Fixed expenses are about $10K.
Then we have various program expenses including communications,
promotion/marketing, WiAC stipend sponsorship, mentorship, etc. LISA is our
biggest conference and we spend less than $3K there, but we also have great
support
Craig Constantine writes:
>i was looking for a general view of expenses.
>
>that's what Brandon mentioned in the email i was replying to.
>
>-- Craig Constantine, [1]http://constantine.name
A couple of subsequent slides have income and expenses pie charts
showing proportions, bu
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Matt Disney wrote:
As I was typing this, Steve chimed in (thanks!).
Also, I'm currently working up the 2014 actuals so we can use that in
nailing down the 2015 programs and budget. Mid-year 2014, we resolved debt
that had been hangin
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Matt Disney wrote:
As I was typing this, Steve chimed in (thanks!).
Also, I'm currently working up the 2014 actuals so we can use that in
nailing down the 2015 programs and budget. Mid-year 2014, we resolved debt
that had been hanging over the organization for some time. Si
As I was typing this, Steve chimed in (thanks!).
Also, I'm currently working up the 2014 actuals so we can use that in
nailing down the 2015 programs and budget. Mid-year 2014, we resolved debt
that had been hanging over the organization for some time. Since then,
we've had normal operational liab
I believe Craig was looking for a break down of sponsorship money to dues.
Not sure if that was in there.
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Steve VanDevender <
ste...@hexadecimal.uoregon.edu> wrote:
> Craig Constantine writes:
> > just to save everyone the trouble...
> >
> > I just glanced thro
Craig Constantine writes:
> just to save everyone the trouble...
>
> I just glanced through the recent meeting minutes over on
> Governance. (which is very handy!) But I don't see any particular
> finance-type reports that would answer this question.
>
> Maybe Matt Disney will chime in? M
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Daniel Gilmartin
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>...
> If all regional events were to be held in the same hotels as the larger
> events - it would be very beneficial. Otherwise unless Usenix has full time
> event management staff to h
just to save everyone the trouble...
I just glanced through the recent meeting minutes over on Governance. (which is
very handy!) But I don't see any particular finance-type reports that would
answer this question.
Maybe Matt Disney will chime in? Matt?
-- Craig Constantine, http://constantin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2/10/2015 1:01 PM, Gilbert Wilson wrote:
> Selling it as a membership based organization that has benefits is,
> and always has been, based on the promise of some sort of undefined
> future return. It’s a very hard sell. Relabelling membership a
On 2015-02-09 18:13, Craig Constantine wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 7:51 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
> There are other benefits now, but in general LOPSA has been until very
> recently still recovering financially and operationally from the Late
> Unpleasantness involving USENIX.
Interesting.
I don’t think “giving up the rope” is a fair conclusion. This is an unfinished
draft idea that the board is considering for future direction. I think it’s
important for the current membership to provide some positive feedback about
what we would like to see if the board were to take this idea an
16 matches
Mail list logo
