Brandon S Allbery KF8NH tangented:
> ...does anyone else still use the old-skool IBM flowcharting templates?
http://www.retroist.com/2009/01/11/ibm-flowcharting-template/
I used one for Structured Design drawings in the 80s.
___
Discuss mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
...does anyone else still use the old-skool IBM flowcharting templates?
- --
brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> I disagree with the choice of using MS Word for documentation, but most of
> my
> customers impose it ; they're happy to buy me a license for Visio (I am
> often
> brought in to document a system), but won't buy it for all their sysadmins.
>
So clearly, someone needs to port Cocoa to Linux. What's the 'Wine'
team up to these days? ;-)
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Josh Smift wrote:
> RLS == Randal L Schwartz
>
> RLS> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:17:31 -0700
>
> RLS> It's a seriously Cocoa app inside, I'm told. I suppose you could
RLS == Randal L Schwartz
RLS> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:17:31 -0700
RLS> It's a seriously Cocoa app inside, I'm told. I suppose you could port
RLS> parts of it to GNUStep, but they made no attempt at portability.
Indeed, their FAQ at http://www.omnigroup.com/products/omnigraffle/support/
says
> "david" == david writes:
david> so how much do we have to bribe them to start making a linux
david> version :-)
It's a seriously Cocoa app inside, I'm told. I suppose you could port
parts of it to GNUStep, but they made no attempt at portability. After
all, Omni is one of the old-school
I prefer ConceptDraw on Mac.
It is very convenient and their tech support is kind of cool too.
I had one time needed a healthcare/medicine related database
(icon/logo) and they just send me one to use for my project.
That was very nice.
The best part of the ConceptDraw is actually if you have t
On 10/15/2010 6:43 AM, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> On 10-10-15 05:28 AM, Matt Simmons wrote:
>> There's certainly a lot to be said for not having fancy icons,
>> particularly in a "working" diagram, as opposed to the "fancy" diagram
>> you show off to management.
> Fancy icons look cool, but they need
On 10-10-15 05:28 AM, Matt Simmons wrote:
> There's certainly a lot to be said for not having fancy icons,
> particularly in a "working" diagram, as opposed to the "fancy" diagram
> you show off to management.
>
Fancy icons look cool, but they need a special tool. If a company is not ready
to buy
Kind of like BC and "Clams got legs".
It takes a huge amount of effort to evolve beyond the status quo.
If you've got something nobody else has got, you are better off
than you were or they are.
Tom Limoncelli made the following keystrokes:
>
>
>At a very shop I drew our network diagram on
At a very shop I drew our network diagram on the whiteboard with 4
colors, took a picture of it, and put it on the wiki along with a
description of what the colors and symbols meant. It wasn't much, but
it was better than what had been done in the past: if you need to
know, log into the routers
There's certainly a lot to be said for not having fancy icons,
particularly in a "working" diagram, as opposed to the "fancy" diagram
you show off to management.
I really do find myself using blank squares or, if I want to give
myself a particular treat, 3d boxes. They have the benefit of being
bl
12 matches
Mail list logo
