On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:04:16 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> >You said there is a correlation even if it's not 1:1.
> >
> >I said that no such correlation exists. It's a myth.
>
> I'll need to see the URL to the statistical survey showing that in
> order to accept it.
I accept, and completely agree,
Can anyone recommend an overview document of systemd? A
motivations/design kind of thing?
Thanks,
Dan
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@driftwood.blu.org
https://driftwood.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:54:32 -0400
Daniel M Gessel wrote:
> Can anyone recommend an overview document of systemd? A
> motivations/design kind of thing?
Lennart Poettering's take:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html
--
\m/ (--) \m/
___
> On the other, do we really need such a thing in order prove that
> Daniel J. Bernstein writes better, safer code than Lennart Poettering?
No, but we also don't need a double-blind study to show that the
average programmer's approach to security is a lot closer to
Poettering's than djb's. (I say
On 6/4/24 07:07, Rich Pieri wrote:
Lennart Poettering's take:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html
Very interesting, thank you. Those point out to me that I should have
more sympathy for systemd, they tackled a hard problem
Unix's architectu
On 6/4/24 09:59, Kent Borg wrote:
-kb, the Kent who doesn't know what a good solution would have been.
Maybe the right approach was to not touch the init system at all, and
instead finish all that D-Bus work to rationalize dynamic dependencies.
Would that work?
And maybe that means submitti
I've been watching this with interest. Back around 1980 I designed a Unix
equivalent to SysV init at Raytheon data systems because system v was not
available at the time. While systemd has its issues, using SysV init to
schedule start up dependencies is difficult. Any it's slow because it is
based
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:59:25 -0700
Kent Borg wrote:
> On 6/4/24 07:07, Rich Pieri wrote:
> > Lennart Poettering's take:
> > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
> > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html
>
> Very interesting, thank you. Those point out to me that I should have
> mo
