On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:59:25 -0700 Kent Borg <kentb...@borg.org> wrote:
> On 6/4/24 07:07, Rich Pieri wrote: > > Lennart Poettering's take: > > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html > > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html > > Very interesting, thank you. Those point out to me that I should have > more sympathy for systemd, they tackled a hard problem And despite all of the problems systemd has? It largely succeeded. Which is why distribution maintainers *love* systemd to pieces. It solves those problems so that they don't have to do it themselves, and does so more or less consistently across different distributions. upstart didn't so much fail as Canonical decided to embrace systemd instead. And I don't blame them for that decision: much more cost effective letting Red Hat do all that heavy lifting. -- \m/ (--) \m/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@driftwood.blu.org https://driftwood.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
