I am having a heck of a time trying to figure out how to do this.
How do I change the attributes of a function based on the
version without copying the function body? For example:
version(StaticVersion) {
static void myLongFunction()
{
// long body ...
}
} else {
void
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 08:24:08 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I am having a heck of a time trying to figure out how to do
this.
How do I change the attributes of a function based on the
version without copying the function body? For example:
version(StaticVersion) {
static void m
How do I (a newbie to D) figure out which compiler set to use?
I am running Ubuntu 14.10, and intend to stick with it in the
long term.
Should I choose DMD or go with GDC?
I would like to know the rationale for suggestions for either.
Thanks.
On 19/02/2015 9:46 p.m., Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
How do I (a newbie to D) figure out which compiler set to use?
I am running Ubuntu 14.10, and intend to stick with it in the long term.
Should I choose DMD or go with GDC?
I would like to know the rationale for suggestions for either.
Thanks.
Atle
Mayuresh Kathe:
Should I choose DMD or go with GDC?
It's a good idea to use all available compilers. LDC and DMD are
both useful. Every one of them has advantages and disadvantages.
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 08:46:11 UTC, Mayuresh Kathe
wrote:
How do I (a newbie to D) figure out which compiler set to use?
I am running Ubuntu 14.10, and intend to stick with it in the
long term.
Should I choose DMD or go with GDC?
I would like to know the rationale for suggestions for
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 08:24:08 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I am having a heck of a time trying to figure out how to do
this.
How do I change the attributes of a function based on the
version without copying the function body? For example:
version(StaticVersion) {
static void m
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 09:38:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 08:24:08 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I am having a heck of a time trying to figure out how to do
this.
How do I change the attributes of a function based on the
version without copying the functio
Most practical approach I am currently aware of is wrapping
actual implementation (in most restrictive version):
class Test {
private static void foo_() {}
version (Static)
{
static void foo() { foo_(); }
}
else
{
void foo() { foo_(); }
}
private void bar_() shared
{
}
version (Sha
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 01:39:19 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
I'd write a foo_impl which always takes a parameter. Then do
the versioned foo() functions which just forward to it:
void foo_impl(int x) { long function u
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 09:10:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 19/02/2015 9:46 p.m., Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
How do I (a newbie to D) figure out which compiler set to use?
I am running Ubuntu 14.10, and intend to stick with it in the
long term.
Should I choose DMD or go with GDC?
I wo
On 20/02/2015 12:10 a.m., Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 09:10:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 19/02/2015 9:46 p.m., Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
How do I (a newbie to D) figure out which compiler set to use?
I am running Ubuntu 14.10, and intend to stick with it in the long
I can understand how to correctly define an instance of
BinaryHeap in my class DijkstraWalker at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/knet/traversal.d#L264
because the comparsion function can't ge access to the class
member distMap
I get the error
need 'this' for 'distMap' of type '
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 10:17:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Most practical approach I am currently aware of is wrapping
actual implementation (in most restrictive version):
I really like mixins for this sort of thing.
```
enum signature = "void longFunction()";
version( Static )
enu
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 11:56:19 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I can understand how to correctly define an instance of
BinaryHeap in my class DijkstraWalker at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/knet/traversal.d#L264
because the comparsion function can't ge access to the class
member
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 11:56:19 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Please provide reduced examples.
This fails:
class C
{
int[] a;
alias BH = BinaryHeap!(int[], (x, y) => (x+a < y));
}
This works:
class C
{
int[] a;
void foo() {
alias BH = BinaryHeap!(int[], (x, y) => (x+a
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:10:11 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> And anyway, GDC is still hasn't been updated to the latest version of D.
> And its the last major D compiler that hasn't.
LDC is 2.067 already? O_O 'cause GDC is 2.066.1 now.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 12:16:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 10:17:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Most practical approach I am currently aware of is wrapping
actual implementation (in most restrictive version):
I really like mixins for this sort of thing.
```
en
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:24:06 +, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> I am having a heck of a time trying to figure out how to do this.
> How do I change the attributes of a function based on the
> version without copying the function body? For example:
>
> version(StaticVersion) {
> static void m
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 21:21:11 UTC, Byron Heads wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 21:05:10 UTC, Byron Heads
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 20:55:56 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:35:44 +, Byron Heads wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 20:33:40
I'm having corrupt symbol table errors on a Win64 build of a big
application, I can't find a way around it. I'm wondering if the COFF
support is still experimental in DMD?
Thanks!
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:33:58 +, Byron Heads wrote:
> Now I am not sure. This code runs correctly:
as i told you before, `fork()` is hard. you can experiment for monthes
seeing strange bugs here and there, and seeing no bugs, and strange bugs,
and...
there are alot of things going on under
On 2/20/2015 1:06 AM, tcak wrote:
@OP: By using a token string (q{}) for funcBody rather than a WYSIWYG
string (r"" or ``), you can still get syntax highlighting in your editor.
Based on your example, bye bye readibility. It is like writing rocket
taking off procedures.
People are complaining
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 01:29:39 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I am not sure what could be the offending obj. I re downloaded
dmd and phobos(pre compiled for windows), cleaned out all my
builds and removed all of the tempfiles for dub that I could
find.
Have you tried running dub with --for
Is it possible to declare a function in D which gets the C++ calling
convetion but not the C++ mangling?
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
On 2015-02-19 11:39 AM, Etienne wrote:
I'm having corrupt symbol table errors on a Win64 build of a big
application, I can't find a way around it. I'm wondering if the COFF
support is still experimental in DMD?
Thanks!
I just counted 67k sections using a printf in DMD... The limit is 65k so
t
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:29:58 -0500, Etienne wrote:
> On 2015-02-19 11:39 AM, Etienne wrote:
>> I'm having corrupt symbol table errors on a Win64 build of a big
>> application, I can't find a way around it. I'm wondering if the COFF
>> support is still experimental in DMD?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> I just
Note the last two lines of this list (i am running OS X 10.10.2
and Xcode 6.1.1):
clang -v -t cprog.c dprog.a -o cprog
Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0
Thread model: posix
"/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/Xco
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 17:23:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I agree that string mixins can kill readability. I encountered
that when I used them to support both D1 and D2 in Derelict 2
years ago. But I think that when they are kept small and local
as in cases like this, they aren't bad at
On 2015-02-19 1:41 PM, ketmar wrote:
i remember that DMD creates one section for each function (to allow
smartlink feature). with templates this can be alot. maybe it needs new
cli flag "--collapse-sections" or something like it.
I watched the section names and discovered over 20,000 sections
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 18:25:10 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
Is it possible to declare a function in D which gets the C++
calling convetion but not the C++ mangling?
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
You can use pragma(mangle, ...) to set whatever mangling you like.
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 21:33:50 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 18:25:10 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
Is it possible to declare a function in D which gets the C++
calling convetion but not the C++ mangling?
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
You can use pragma(mangl
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 07:46:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/18/2015 10:39 PM, stewarth wrote:
> This works under dmd 2066.1 but fails under dmd 2.067-b2.
I don't know whether it is a bug.
> struct B {
> A* a;
In any case, that must be immutable(A)*.
> }
>
> static immutable
On 2/19/15 12:01 PM, ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:33:58 +, Byron Heads wrote:
Now I am not sure. This code runs correctly:
as i told you before, `fork()` is hard. you can experiment for monthes
seeing strange bugs here and there, and seeing no bugs, and strange bugs,
and...
th
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:12:02 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 2/19/15 12:01 PM, ketmar wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:33:58 +, Byron Heads wrote:
>>
>>> Now I am not sure. This code runs correctly:
>>
>> as i told you before, `fork()` is hard. you can experiment for monthes
>> seeing
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 14:12:51 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 11:56:19 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Please provide reduced examples.
This fails:
class C
{
int[] a;
alias BH = BinaryHeap!(int[], (x, y) => (x+a < y));
}
This works:
class C
{
int[] a;
On 20/02/2015 5:08 a.m., ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:10:11 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
And anyway, GDC is still hasn't been updated to the latest version of D.
And its the last major D compiler that hasn't.
LDC is 2.067 already? O_O 'cause GDC is 2.066.1 now.
Well according to G
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:29:09 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> On 20/02/2015 5:08 a.m., ketmar wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:10:11 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>>
>>> And anyway, GDC is still hasn't been updated to the latest version of
>>> D.
>>> And its the last major D compiler that hasn't.
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 02:08:19 +, ketmar wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:29:09 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/2015 5:08 a.m., ketmar wrote:
>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:10:11 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>>>
And anyway, GDC is still hasn't been updated to the latest version o
On 20/02/2015 3:11 p.m., ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 02:08:19 +, ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:29:09 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 20/02/2015 5:08 a.m., ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:10:11 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
And anyway, GDC is still hasn't been updat
Hi,
I'm trying to follow the instructions for vibe-d with:
>dub init web vibe.d
>cd web
>dub
and then add the line "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "win32"}"
to the dub.json file.
This however is producing errors during linking. Could I get a
hand?
Pastebin of dub --vverbose: h
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 02:50:05 UTC, Charles wrote:
Pastebin of dub --vverbose: http://pastebin.com/4BcHJM74
Target vibe-d 0.7.22 is up to date. Use --force to rebuild.
Have you tried the --force switch to rebuild vibe.d?
Looks like the existing vibe.d lib was build against a differe
I managed to copy an application bundle and change stuff inside
it to run my executable, but it was very manual and kinda
hackish. Also I can't get my application to load images that I
place in the Resources folder(or any folder in the bundle for
that matter).
Is there an official way to tur
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 02:55:32 UTC, MartinNowak wrote:
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 02:50:05 UTC, Charles wrote:
Pastebin of dub --vverbose: http://pastebin.com/4BcHJM74
Target vibe-d 0.7.22 is up to date. Use --force to rebuild.
Have you tried the --force switch to rebuild vibe.d
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 04:00:21 UTC, Charles wrote:
Yes, I have. Here's a pastebin with --force --vverbose:
http://pastebin.com/qZEKUN46
Just tried the dub init web vibe.d && cd web && dub thing, works
for me.
So the most interesting questions.
- What version of dub and dmd are you u
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 04:13:08 UTC, MartinNowak wrote:
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 04:00:21 UTC, Charles wrote:
Yes, I have. Here's a pastebin with --force --vverbose:
http://pastebin.com/qZEKUN46
Just tried the dub init web vibe.d && cd web && dub thing,
works for me.
So the mos
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 03:26:47 UTC, Gan wrote:
I managed to copy an application bundle and change stuff inside
it to run my executable, but it was very manual and kinda
hackish. Also I can't get my application to load images that I
place in the Resources folder(or any folder in the bun
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 03:26:47 UTC, Gan wrote:
Also I can't get my application to load images that I place in
the Resources folder(or any folder in the bundle for that
matter).
I suggest to have a look at the projects generated by SFML
regarding locating the resources in C++/ObjC and t
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 06:10:51 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 03:26:47 UTC, Gan wrote:
Also I can't get my application to load images that I place in
the Resources folder(or any folder in the bundle for that
matter).
I suggest to have a look at the projects
On Thursday, 19 February 2015 at 08:46:11 UTC, Mayuresh Kathe
wrote:
Should I choose DMD or go with GDC?
I work with projects whose code is half written in C, half
written in D. I use GNU make to build them. I found out that
using GDC was a much better choice for several reasons:
- project
50 matches
Mail list logo
