On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 21:35:29 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 19:11:51 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
[...]
No need for a code. See, there is a keyword called `ref`, that
can be used both in function parameters and in foreach loops,
and it is the equivalent of
On 8/4/22 00:57, pascal111 wrote:
> I don't see my post.
Some posts are blocked by the spam filter. (Apparently, your message did
not have a sender name and cannot be passed because of that.)
Ali
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 21:37:50 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 19:11:51 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
[...]
I agree to the extent that I wanted to do so, and might still
have if a delivery hadn't interrupted by post. But one way to
encourage others to put in more effort
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 19:11:51 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:53:35 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:33:37 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I changed it to "x=notfunny(x);" and has the same result.
Now you are changing the value of the temporary lo
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 19:11:51 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:53:35 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:33:37 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I changed it to "x=notfunny(x);" and has the same result.
Now you are changing the value of the temporary lo
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:53:35 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:33:37 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I changed it to "x=notfunny(x);" and has the same result.
Now you are changing the value of the temporary loop variable
that is still immediately discarded afterwards.
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:33:37 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I changed it to "x=notfunny(x);" and has the same result.
Now you are changing the value of the temporary loop variable
that is still immediately discarded afterwards.
You should return a new range that has the values you want, no
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 18:25:50 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 17:33:40 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 17:09:11 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 16:59:53 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I tried to make a template that receive lambda ex
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 17:33:40 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 17:09:11 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 16:59:53 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I tried to make a template that receive lambda expression to
apply it on a given range the user specifies, but
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 17:09:11 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 16:59:53 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I tried to make a template that receive lambda expression to
apply it on a given range the user specifies, but I found
non-understood problem:
Compare with:
```D
auto fo
On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 16:59:53 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
I tried to make a template that receive lambda expression to
apply it on a given range the user specifies, but I found
non-understood problem:
Compare with:
```D
auto foo(Range)(Range range) { // remove isInputRange!T test
...
11 matches
Mail list logo
