I’m sorry that this isn’t a solution to your problem but your
code caught my attention. What is your snippet supposed to do?
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 19:42:22 UTC, Marcone wrote:
How can I create a Standalone Bundle Portable file application
using Dlang?
Could you describe what you mean with "Bundle portable file
application"?
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 12:41:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 12:17:24 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...]
Not fighting the GC, but the whole argument about improving it,
or mix or match, does not work for most developers looking for
a new language. So either ther
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 15:18:40 UTC, aberba wrote:
1). You're not a minority at all. System programming is also
vast so having a GC (especially D's special kind of GC) is
nothing alien in System programming. If you look out there,
This is not true, and you know it.
There is nothing spe
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 19:54:04 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 19:34:52 UTC, Jack wrote:
is that sytax derived from there?
sort of. it is the type pattern matching "is expression"
described here:
https://dlang.org/spec/expression.html#IsExpression
I read st
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 19:50:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I haven't played with the pragma yet but I've done it before
both with the file.exe.manifest XML file sitting alongside it
and with the resource compiler before (you can use the same
resource compilers for D as you use for C btw)
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 19:34:52 UTC, Jack wrote:
is that sytax derived from there?
sort of. it is the type pattern matching "is expression"
described here:
https://dlang.org/spec/expression.html#IsExpression
The is(A:B) thing technically means "if A is implicitly
convertible to B" w
I haven't played with the pragma yet but I've done it before both
with the file.exe.manifest XML file sitting alongside it and with
the resource compiler before (you can use the same resource
compilers for D as you use for C btw)
How can I create a Standalone Bundle Portable file application
using Dlang?
Currently I'm using dmd but the release binaries I'll be usind
ldc. Is this how I can enable visual styles on dmd? and how is
this done on ldc?
pragma(linkerDirective, "\"/manifestdependency:type='win32' " ~
"name='Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls'
version='6.0
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 19:02:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 18:40:37 UTC, Jack wrote:
isInstanceOf from std.traits seems to not work with class the
way I need to. I'd like to make a template function accepts
only class of a specified class type
class A { }
c
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 18:40:37 UTC, Jack wrote:
isInstanceOf from std.traits seems to not work with class the
way I need to. I'd like to make a template function accepts
only class of a specified class type
class A { }
class B : A { }
class C : A { }
int f(T)(in A[int] arr)
Use
if(
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 at 12:15:00 UTC, Fynn Schröder wrote:
I'm puzzled why RefCounted and foreach do not work well
together, i.e.:
```
auto range = refCounted(nonCopyableRange); // ok
foreach(e; range) // Error: struct is not copyable because it
is annotated with @disable
// do some
isInstanceOf from std.traits seems to not work with class the way
I need to. I'd like to make a template function accepts only
class of a specified class type
class A { }
class B : A { }
class C : A { }
import std.traits : isInstanceOf;
int f(T)(in A[int] arr)
if(isInstanceOf!(A, T)) // does
Hello, is it possible to create constructor which initialize
'ptr3' with const rvalue of same type?
struct Foo{}
static struct Ptr{
void* impl;
//ctor 1
this(ref const typeof(this) x)pure nothrow @trusted
@nogc{/*...*/}
//ctor 2
this(const Foo foo)pure nothrow @trusted @
The mutex isn't more "global", it's more "local" (although,
this will make it shared).
Yes shared, this is what I meant by global :) Thanks, it's
clearer now.
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 03:30:56 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 02:24:59 UTC, Jack wrote:
I know I can set version but I'd looking for a native way, if
any, to do that. Is possible to tell if output binary is
library or executable at compile time? then I'd call diff
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 13:14:16 UTC, Arafel wrote:
On 18/1/21 13:41, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
Yes, it is natural that the current D population don't mind
the current GC. Otherwise they would be gone... but then you
have to factor in all the people that go through the revolving
door an
On 1/18/21 7:48 AM, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 at 20:42:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/17/21 2:27 PM, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 at 15:41:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'm trying to run unittests using `dub test`, and I wanted to use
the ne
On 1/17/21 6:54 PM, ludo wrote:
Yes alright. I think the dev made a design mistake because he called
synchronized( OpenAL.mutex ) when it should be more of a global, non
OpenAL specific, mutex. I mean in the code there were things like
(pseudo-code)
---
System {
private int[] buffer
fu
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 13:14:16 UTC, Arafel wrote:
I must be in the minority here because one of the reasons why I
started using D was precisely because it HAS a GC with full
support. I wouldn't even have considered it if it hadn't.
You are probably not in a minority among those that us
On 18/1/21 13:41, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
Yes, it is natural that the current D population don't mind the current
GC. Otherwise they would be gone... but then you have to factor in all
the people that go through the revolving door and does not stay. If they
stayed the eco system would be bet
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 at 20:42:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/17/21 2:27 PM, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 at 15:41:45 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I'm trying to run unittests using `dub test`, and I wanted to
use the new -checkaction=context feature to avoid h
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 12:17:24 UTC, aberba wrote:
If you read the Origin of D book, you would see that the GC was
a desire thing when D was designed probably due to how useful
it is for ... as said, 90% or so of software development. So at
this point, fighting the GC isn't (in my opinio
On Friday, 15 January 2021 at 21:49:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:04:13PM +, welkam via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
As the joke goes, "you can write assembly code in any
language". :-D If you code in a sloppy way, it doesn't matter
what language you write in,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:43:20AM +, aberba via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> It talks how the use of GC is desired even in a game engine like
> Unreal. Several AAA title's have been built on Unreal.
>
> Apparently you can't convince people who have made up their mind about
> GC being a
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 11:55:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 11:43:20 UTC, aberba wrote:
Nevertheless, GC in D isn't going anywhere. And if the
approach for writing nogc code in D doesn't cut it, then I'm
not what else will.
As long as that attitude pre
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 11:43:20 UTC, aberba wrote:
Nevertheless, GC in D isn't going anywhere. And if the approach
for writing nogc code in D doesn't cut it, then I'm not what
else will.
As long as that attitude prevails, D will be going nowhere as
well.
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 07:11:20 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 01:41:35 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
Those were not aberba's words, but the author of the first
link, in which one does find a conceptual, high level
description of GC.
I read it, it said nothin
29 matches
Mail list logo
