Re: moving lines with shapes

2001-05-22 Thread James K. Lowden
Aaron Trevena wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2001, Andre Kloss wrote: > > > +--+ > > > | | > > > | X<--+ > > > | | +---x---+ > > > +--+ | | > > > | | > >

Re: Win32 plugin build

2001-06-02 Thread James K. Lowden
Lennon Day-Reynolds wrote: > Any bright ideas, aside from wiping Windows off the demo machine? Lennon, Darn! You took my best idea! Rather than trying to Win32ize it in a rush, since you've got cygwin going, why not just set up an X server? I haven't tried it myself, but it sure looks ready

Re: dia file exchange

2001-06-07 Thread James K. Lowden
Lars Clausen wrote: > I guess using OLE to convert files is the only viable option. Does anyone > here know OLE well enough to attempt such? Yes. The OLE bit wouldn't be that hard, actually, with Perl and decent documentation of Visio's object model. What might not be so simple is mapping the

Re: dia file exchange

2001-06-08 Thread James K. Lowden
Hi Lyle, Lyle wrote: > The other group (of which I am a member) use Dia but need to give the > diagrams in editable format to superiors who use Visio. This is really what > I was after. I agree that open file formats are better, but to gain > acceptance, any new software needs to be able to wo

Re: dia file exchange

2001-06-08 Thread James K. Lowden
Lennon Day-Reynolds wrote: > You could also just write a standalone (or Visio-hosted) > Perl/Python/VB/JScript tool that used the Visio OLE controls and the > MSXML parser to do the transformation in either direction. I'm not a big > Windows Scripting guy, but I've done enough basic stuff in this

Re: Trouble connect ftp site

2001-06-11 Thread James K. Lowden
Joel Becerra Miranda wrote: > Please, can send me a copy of last version of Dia, I can't connect > to ftp site because I am inside in firewall. Joel, Did someone help you? I wonder how to solve the firewall problem. You can't last long using free software if you don't have a way to download f

Re: Shapes layout proposal

2001-06-13 Thread James K. Lowden
Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > if you show me a shiny new dia core, with DOM as > its kernel, and the resulting stuff is not only as featureful (including all > current object types) as the "classic" dia of then, but also naturally is > able to reload older files (though it might be through an incomp

Re: Shapes layout proposal

2001-06-17 Thread James K. Lowden
Cyrille, James, Lars, Lennon, John, Andre, all One of the difficulties faced by anyone approaching a new project is understanding its technical design. In need of a top-down document that says "Here is the problem, here's how we went about attacking it, here're the pieces and how they behave", o

dia2shape

2001-06-17 Thread James K. Lowden
All, The whole shape proposal discussion led me to another notion I don't recall having seen discussed. It seems to me it should be possible to use Dia to create Dia shapes. What needed is enough information in a Dia diagram to create a .shape file, and an XSLT file that describes the transform

Re: Shapes layout proposal

2001-06-20 Thread James K. Lowden
John, I take the silence from everyone else to be anything this side of "are you nuts?" That is, they either agree or are taking a wait-and-see approach. For now, we're in. So let me firm up where I think we're going, you and I, at least. > I think tables are harder to work with than nested

Re: XML Schema

2001-06-23 Thread James K. Lowden
John Palmieri wrote: > I'm getting a little bit of a feel for XML Schema's. ... I think they are a > better way to represent the shapes instead of DTD's. John, what do we need that DTD's don't provide? libxml supports DTDs and is starting to support XPath and XSLTs. We'll get done sooner if w

Re: UrShape XML parser

2001-06-24 Thread James K. Lowden
All, I spent today researching the technologies we're using and considering. I've come to some conclusions that need peer evaluation. I'm going to make some bald assertions for brevity; please infer your own "as I see it" and "to the best of my knowledge" wherever you think weasle words are appr

Re: UrShape XML parser

2001-06-24 Thread James K. Lowden
John Palmieri wrote: > Oh, you do want to use C++. Ouch, I just thought you were just thinking in > C++. As much as I love C++ I think that forcing the maintainers to switch > might not be a good thing. If I have learned anything for developing with Open > Source is to always follow the coding

Re: XML Schema

2001-06-24 Thread James K. Lowden
John Palmieri wrote: > Since it is only used to define the file format and since work > can go on on other parts without having the validator/compiler I don't think that > using them will have any negative impact. However if you think that having a DTD > around would be good I can do it both way

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-03 Thread James K. Lowden
Dolores Alia de Saravia wrote: > Sorry. I agree with you. > It is > http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; > what I wanted to say is that NEWS file proposed > http://www.w3.org/2000/SVG > which is incorrect. Dolores, I don't think it's really "incorrect". The W3C says that case "shouldn't" matter

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-05 Thread James K. Lowden
James Henstridge wrote: > As for whether case should matter for xml namespace URIs, the current code > for loading shape files uses the standard libxml function to get a handle > for the namespace. As libxml doesn't perform case folding here, I doubt > that URIs are supposed to be case insensiti

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-07 Thread James K. Lowden
Daniel Veillard wrote: > The namespace name for the SVG specification is > >http://www.w3.org/2000/svg > > This is defined normatively in the appendix A of the specification: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/svgdtd.html > > This namespace name is different from "http://www.w3.org/2000/SVG";, >

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-07 Thread James K. Lowden
> Saying that 2 URIs with different path sections are or should be the same > resource is plain wrong As indicated by "Namespaces in XML" at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/ to wit: > [Definition:] URI references which identify namespaces are considered identical when >they are exactly the s

Schema Mania

2001-07-17 Thread James K. Lowden
Hello everyone, I have put together a little web site that I hope will be useful to people who'd like Dia to be a good data modelling tool. I've collected the links to known dia<->sql projects, and described the current state of things. I would be grateful for any advice and/or comments. Most

best ISP

2001-07-17 Thread James K. Lowden
John Palmieri wrote: > Can anyone recommend the best ISP I can > use with Linux while I wait for DSL to be implemented in my area? John, I'm that rare bird: I like my ISP. Speakeasy.org has dial-up in your area. I recently helped a friend hook up her FreeBSD box to them; she used Debian (wvdi

Re: Schema Mania

2001-07-19 Thread James K. Lowden
Lars Clausen wrote: > Cool! I've added you to the Dia links page Thanks, Lars! You were perhaps a little tired when you put that page together? I've attached a patch for it that fixes a few small things. Regards, --jkl +++ [begin patch] bash-2.04# diff -u links.html links2.html --- lin

Re: UrShapes coding update

2001-07-30 Thread James K. Lowden
Andre Kloss wrote: > Did RMS not say "b4 a million I's, all bucks r shallow"? ;) Hi Andre, Are you referring to Eric Raymond's formulation of "Linus's Law" in "The Cathedral and the Bazaar"? "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow." http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaa

Re: UrShapes

2001-08-06 Thread James K. Lowden
John Palmieri wrote: > Andre Kloss wrote: > > >Hi, John, hi Cyrille, hi everyone! > > > >Cyrille: The "Ur" in UrShape is a) an arch german word for ox ;) or > >(and that's what we mean) b) german prefix meaning "arch" as in > >"archetype". Well, John doesn't seem to be german, but he came up with

Re: Three arrows

2002-03-15 Thread James K . Lowden
On 14 Mar 2002 17:48:28 -0600 "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure about whether a stem is a good idea or not, either. I am. :) Hands down, the stem is an improvement. #3 is a winner. Regards, --jkl ___ Dia-list mailing list

Re: Hello

2002-03-22 Thread James K . Lowden
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 07:48:45 +1100 "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't shoot me if this is a really stupid idea. It's only software. One of the rules is, no one gets shot. Even for really really stupid ideas. Because if they did, who'd be left standing? --jkl ___

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-04-23 Thread James K . Lowden
> is Search/Find really a function that Dia is likely to add at a later > state? If Dia gets good at managing 100+ objects, find-by-name will become necessary. Lars, FWIW, please add one No vote on the start-up hints. Thanks to you, I read Joel's book tonight, which doesn't contain anything e

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-04-25 Thread James K . Lowden
On 23 Apr 2002 14:33:23 -0500 "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, James K. Lowden wrote: > > When I start a program, the last thing I want is hints about how to do > > something I'm not thinking about. It's self-important.

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-04-25 Thread James K . Lowden
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:27:51 + "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Using Glade, I mocked up a > > new preferences dialog > > Could you post a screen shot, for those of us without Glade? But of course. See http://www.SchemaMania.org/dia/noodle/ for a .PNG and .JPEG. Please ign

Re: Do you know why I cant be able to use tildes and accents

2002-04-27 Thread James K . Lowden
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:29:18 -0300 "Belen Leonardo Javier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I started using DIA but I faced an unexpected problem: I cannot make DIA > to write accents (spanish) and "eñes" in the text boxes, Please help, > since I believe I can use it a lot but I need the full alphabe

Re: Dia's user interface

2002-05-01 Thread James K . Lowden
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:43:05 +0200 "Hubert Figuiere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Properties Dialog > - > it can be opened using Dialog->Property. I didn't guess that. "Dialog" is an odd menu item IMHO. There are several reasonable locations on the main menu for Properties: Edit

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-05-01 Thread James K . Lowden
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:30:55 +0200 "Ben Hetland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > This is a pretty common and useful features in CAD > > > programs. "Reverse drag" means drawing the selection > > > rectangle from right to left, rather than left to right > > > (maybe "Reverse drag" is too Euro-cent

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-05-02 Thread James K . Lowden
On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:56:04 +0100 (IST) "Alan Horkan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.SchemaMania.org/dia/noodle/dia_preferences.glade. > > I would still really appreciate if someone could make a screenshot > available. I did. http://www.SchemaMania.org/dia/noodle/ Glade doesn't r

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-05-02 Thread James K . Lowden
On 30 Apr 2002 22:27:16 -0500 "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.SchemaMania.org/dia/noodle/ > > > > As you can see, I was able to reduce the size of the dialog by 3x > > I really like the look of that. The prefs dialog at the moment is an > eyesore (though very easy to

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-05-03 Thread James K . Lowden
On 02 May 2002 09:26:15 -0500 "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Basically, the problem is one of mapping Dia's internal preferences > > structure onto the Glade-generated widget code. prefs_create_dialog > > becomes very different, because the widgets already exist. With > > cle

plugging in to plugins

2002-05-03 Thread James K . Lowden
Is there a favorite place you know where I can read about plugins? Everyone talks about creating a plugin like it's the easiest and most natural thing in the world, but I don't have a clue. Like, is there a Hello World plugin somewhere, with a tutorial? Sorry if this is a dumb question. It

Re: fonts coming out squares

2002-05-11 Thread James K . Lowden
On Sat, 11 May 2002 00:44:38 -0400 "chad townsend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lars Clausen wrote: > > On Fri, 10 May 2002, chad townsend wrote: > > > >>when i type text it's coming out as little squares, what's causing > >this?>thanks... > > > > Usually that means you're typing characters that

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-05-16 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 07 May 2002 11:44:33 +0200 "Ben Hetland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2002 00:17:34 -0400, "James K.Lowden" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I propose: Leave the feature on. Reverse dragging selects > > intersecting objects, and Forward dragging does not. If the user > > h

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-05-16 Thread James K . Lowden
On Tue, 07 May 2002 11:44:33 +0200 "Ben Hetland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2002 00:17:34 -0400, "James K.Lowden" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I propose: Leave the feature on. Reverse dragging selects > > intersecting objects, and Forward dragging does not. If the user > > h

Re: [long] lots of problems, you did ask ... [was Re: RC1 stats]

2002-05-27 Thread James K. Lowden
On Mon, 27 May 2002 09:23:19 +0200 "Hans Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The tree view is intersting, but i was also hoping/expecting to see the > >new Preferences dialog and Hubert Figueres toolbar enhancement. > > > IIRC there was no consensus on the new Prefernces dialog (at least > I se

Re: Need help with dia

2002-06-03 Thread James K . Lowden
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 04:12:13 +0200 "Bob Marcan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > He can edit this file, and find lines > > that describe loading. It's a simple xml file ... > > It is a simple xml file! > Guys, you are making a fine tool, but you are spoiling the > idea of the unix config files. Th

Re: UTF-8 on stdout?

2002-07-06 Thread James K . Lowden
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 22:37:37 +0100 (BST), "Andrew Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact, the more I think about this, the more I get confused. > I can't seem to find any good introduction/references to all > this stuff on the web. Does anyone know where I can go to learn > more about charac

Re: shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

2002-07-10 Thread James K . Lowden
On 10 Jul 2002 21:14:01 -0500, "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The dtds are not actually used by Dia, they are for informational > purposes. I didn't know that. Is it undesirable for Dia to use its DTD? I have this cockamamie idea that XLST will eventually to be the dia2world v

Re: shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

2002-07-11 Thread James K . Lowden
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:03:31 +0100 (BST), "Andrew Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it undesirable for Dia to use its DTD? > > Well, normally, 'using' a DTD would involve validating the > input XML/SGML (or whatever format is derived from it), to > ensure that the syntax is valid. That

Re: shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

2002-07-11 Thread James K . Lowden
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:29:16 +0100 (BST), "Andrew Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have in mind generating Dia files from external sources, > > "sql2dia" if you will. Properly done, that would rely on the > > DTD to determine the output structure. > > I'm not so sure that's true, is it

Re: First offered sheet

2002-07-16 Thread James K . Lowden
On 15 Jul 2002 16:32:37 -0500, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, James Michael DuPont wrote: > > > > I think that one of the problems that I have with dia is the missing > > concept of an application. Call me a windows user, but I dont like > > fighting with all these

Re: Pango, UTF-8 & Latin1

2002-08-01 Thread James K . Lowden
On 31 Jul 2002 13:30:33 -0500, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It may be sufficient for dia to only support utf-8. You generally dont > > create dia files by hand, so you probably shouldnt care which encoding > > they are in. > > We need to support non-utf8 encodings for two reasons

Re: Latex plugin

2002-08-31 Thread James K . Lowden
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:16:30 +0100 (IST), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Ben V wrote: > > > > But there is something i am a bit struglling with, is to > > write equation or at least greek symbols. > > Would it be possible, to have a plugin, which will allows to > >

Re: long method signatures in uml class diagrams

2002-10-13 Thread James K. Lowden
On 13 Oct 2002 09:35:35 -0500, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Marco Craveiro wrote: > > basically i am using dia to > > document a fairly large and complex c++ project and a lot of the > > methods have really long signatures. what i want to know is: is it > > possi

Re: long method signatures in uml class diagrams

2002-10-13 Thread James K. Lowden
On 13 Oct 2002 14:35:51 -0500, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would you say the following is an > > example of "an overly complex system"? > > > > template > > basic_string > > operator+(const basic_string& s1, charT c) > > Yes, I would, but that's really a gripe about C++, not abo

Re: changing properties dialogue

2002-10-19 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 19:59:06 +0100 (IST), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The error many dialog designers make is to enable "OK" before it > > should be. Until the requisite data are provided, it should be > > disabled. Taking your password dialog example, if "OK" is disabled > > until

Re: changing properties dialogue

2002-10-17 Thread James K. Lowden
On 17 Oct 2002 08:38:57 -0500, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You probably dont want hitting return anywhere in a dialog to be > > equivalent to okay. for example in a password dialog hitting return > > after typing in the username it does not make sense to hit ok, it > > should bring

Re: Autodia - got it

2002-10-25 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:12:43 +0100 (IST), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i turn off the gzip compression and i have never had a problem with > uncompressed dia Perhaps he hadn't turned it off. Is it supposed to autodetect? --jkl > On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Philip Stolz wrote: > > > D

Re: Problems resizing

2002-10-30 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:06:31 -0800 (PST), Curt Crandall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the buttons on the bottom of most dialog boxes has > close first, followed by apply and then ok. Since I'm > used to the order being ok, apply and close, this has > been a source of some frustration. Placing "OK

Re: Dia & Schemas/DTDs

2002-11-06 Thread James K. Lowden
On 06 Nov 2002 12:26:43 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Durk Strooisma wrote: > > > > We noticed that Dia doens't make use of DTDs or XML Schemas (for > > example to validate Dia XML documents). Even correct DTDs or XML > > Schemas aren't provided, which would

Re: Dia and sybols for network items

2002-11-08 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:04:50 + (GMT), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example would it be nice to include a name > > field in the router symbol. Can you point me in the right direction or > > Would it be nice? Personally, I dont think so. > > Why include it in the Shape? Why not j

unicode fonts and the GTK

2002-11-10 Thread James K. Lowden
Hello, Someone on another list discussing a different GTK-based application stated that GTK has a limitation: it cannot display "accented European characters (French, German) AND Japanese" in the same ... something. I know Dia is undergoing major freetype fontism and pangosity, and wondered if

Re: UML module hackery

2002-11-11 Thread James K. Lowden
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:26:12 +0100, Cyrille Chepelov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this mostly affects > languages with complex ligature and letter form rules, ie Arabic, > Devanagri or Thai; Point of order, Mr. President. Devanagri is the script and Hindi is the language. :) A friend

Re: Structuring DIA sheets

2002-12-16 Thread James K. Lowden
On 16 Dec 2002 09:33:53 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > as the number of dia sheets is now quite large, > > I guess it would be interesting to have some > > structuring/display mechanism to manage them such as: > > - grouping sheets by category (and maybe subcategory) > > eg. net

Re: print preview

2003-01-15 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:51:05 + (GMT), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Short answer > No. Print Preview is not available > > Longer Answer, Possible workaround would be to print to a file and then > use some sort of a postcript veiwer such as Alladin Ghostscript. The muscle of a r

Re: Adding new shapes [Re: Dia]

2003-01-27 Thread James K. Lowden
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:58:16 + (GMT), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would quite like to get the Dia Manual converted from SGML DocBook to > XML DocBook. Why? --jkl ___ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailma

Re: Is there a way to prin in multiple pages?

2003-01-28 Thread James K. Lowden
On 28 Jan 2003 08:35:15 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Leonardo Javier Belén wrote: > > > And another feature that can be useful is to print only the page that > > is changed, I mean, to be possible to select which page of all the > > ones that build the diag

Re: Adding new shapes [Re: Dia]

2003-01-28 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:15:16 + (GMT), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:58:16 + (GMT), Alan Horkan > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would quite like to get the Di

Re: XML

2003-02-01 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 22:45:29 -0800, John Edstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The DTD is in the doc directory of the tarball. I don't think we have > > a more detailed description around. > > I got my dia as a binary .rpm and the DTD didn't come with it. I just > DLed the source and the DTDs a

Re: Looking for PDF version of the dia manual

2003-02-01 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:11:09 +0200, Steffen Macke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone with a better docbook setup send > me a PDF version of the current dia manual? I just downloaded the latest snapshot, to try to build the docs for Steffen. What am I doing wrong? Looking through the doc/

Re: Looking for PDF version of the dia manual

2003-02-01 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 20:55:41 +0200, Steffen Macke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > AFAIK the manual has not been changed since 2001, and is the same as > > in version 0.90 > > Well, I did some minor changes, like updating the inforation about > supported filetypes. There were errors in today's snaps

Re: Looking for PDF version of the dia manual

2003-02-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:11:09 +0200, Steffen Macke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone with a better docbook setup send > me a PDF version of the current dia manual? I would like to > include it in the win32 release. I just can't get the images to > work... My setup has exactly the same symp

Re: Looking for PDF version of the dia manual

2003-02-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 10:49:46 -0500, "James K. Lowden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:11:09 +0200, Steffen Macke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Could someone with a better docbook setup send > > me a PDF version of the current dia manua

Re: Looking for PDF version of the dia manual

2003-02-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:11:09 +0200, Steffen Macke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone with a better docbook setup send > me a PDF version of the current dia manual? I would like to > include it in the win32 release. I just can't get the images to > work... Done. http://www.schemamania.org/

Re: [DIA] [newbie] modeling mysql data

2003-02-06 Thread James K. Lowden
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:16:09 -0200, "Gilberto Garcia Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get Dia. But, I don´t know if it is able to model mysql data or not. > If its capable of that, can someone explain to me how to get the > apropriate shapes to do that? Yes, I think so. You use the UML shapes,

Re: Text Entry [Re: direct text input for UML-message]

2003-02-10 Thread James K. Lowden
On 10 Feb 2003 16:21:03 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Alan Horkan wrote: > > > > If you use TAB to move between fields then you cannot put tabs in your > > text boxes. > > True, unless we add some escape sequence. But how often do you need to > put a tab i

Re: Dia-list digest, Vol 1 #758 - 5 msgs

2003-02-18 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:12:59 -0800, "Graham Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm using Dia v0.90 and have created a table that is to contain about > 500 records. Instead of typing them in, I have a file with all of these > values. I cannot simply open the Dia file with a text editor and ad

Re: Dia-list digest, Vol 1 #758 - 5 msgs

2003-02-18 Thread James K. Lowden
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 03:13:15 + (GMT), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It also makes things simpler when programs dont use the same extension > for different contents, but i should know better and use "file" instead > of crude guessing based on file extension. If I may offer a random

Re: Dia-list digest, Vol 1 #758 - 5 msgs

2003-02-19 Thread James K. Lowden
On 19 Feb 2003 12:29:14 -0800, dialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > .gz.dia (as you similarly suggest) would still associate the file with > Dia, which is good, and a human could tell it was gzipped. > > But I don't know that a computer would be able to tell this is a gzipped > Dia file, and so

Re: More than one textbox in a shape?

2003-02-22 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:58:33 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible to have more than one textbox in a user defined shape? > > Not more than one that is editable. Does the SVG specification allow more than one text field? The one I read (about a year ago) didn't seem t

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-01 Thread James K. Lowden
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:02:29 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... 0.91-pre4.tar.gz ... will hopefully be the final version. I thought I'd be the first to compile it on NetBSD, but I'm missing something, apparently. I have freetype-2.1.3. $ ../configure --enable-gnome ..

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 09:01:29 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > checking for FT_Init_FreeType in -lfreetype... no > > configure: error: Can't find FreeType library > > > > $ pkg_info -L freetype2 |g

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 11:14:58 -0500, "James K. Lowden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 09:01:29 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > > checking for FT_Init_FreeType in -lfreety

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:29:36 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > > > configure: error: Need FreeType library version 2.0.9 or higher > > > > But I have 2.1.3, which might not be set up right, yet. Doe

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 14:35:14 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:29:36 -0600, Lars Clausen > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: &

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-02 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 18:59:43 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > You have a version of FreeType 1 installed, maybe that is causing > confusion? Lars, FreeType 1 wasn't the problem. Enough -I switches was. Eventuall

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-03 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 21:52:41 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > > FreeType 1 wasn't the problem. Enough -I switches was. Eventually, I > > read the speech in ft2build.h about what 2.1 would mean (but evidently

Re: prerelease 4

2003-03-05 Thread James K. Lowden
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:26:33 -0500, "James K. Lowden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > > > > FreeType 1 wasn't the problem. Enough -I switches was. Eventually, > > > I read the speech in ft2build.h ab

pre4 on NetBSD, round 2

2003-03-06 Thread James K . Lowden
[in our last episode, our hero discovered a weirdly installed version of freetype2 in /usr/X11R6. He sent a summons for help to netbsd.org, but no help has arrived. Perhaps the messenger was ambushed! But, by the mere trick of rejiggering his PATH, the ../configure gang was diverted to Completio

Re: pre4 on NetBSD, round 2

2003-03-08 Thread James K. Lowden
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:22:10 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [pango] must be >= 1.1.5 (and configure is supposed to check that). > That number was found by trial and error and may need to be upped. Sorry about that. That's what I've got, too. $ pkg-config --modversion pan

Re: pre4 on NetBSD, round 2

2003-03-08 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:25:10 -0500, "James K. Lowden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:22:10 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > The errors indicate FT_Bitmap isn't defined. FT_Bitmap is in > /usr/pkg/includ

default font

2003-03-08 Thread James K. Lowden
All, I've got pre4 working! It's a real step up from 0.88. Now, a few simple questions, if I may. 1. How is the menu font chosen? My menu is really tiny, 6 or 8 points, I'd say. Do I have to set my X server to "know" I'm running 100 dpi? Old GTK apps looked fine, but Dia and Bluefish are

HIG and Escape

2003-03-09 Thread James K. Lowden
I hear tell 0.94 will be partly about HIG compliance. I noticed (who hasn't) that Escape doesn't activate Cancel. I think it should, but the HIG doesn't say so that I can find. In fact, it doesn't say boo about escape except wrt to mouse actions, of all things. In the UI overhaul, I hope Esca

Re: HIG and Escape

2003-03-10 Thread James K. Lowden
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:43:01 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Alan Horkan wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Lars Clausen wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 21:01:01 -0600 > >> From: Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > &g

Re: HIG and Escape

2003-03-10 Thread James K. Lowden
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 21:01:01 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, James K. Lowden wrote: > > I hear tell 0.94 will be partly about HIG compliance. I noticed (who > > You mean 0.92, and yes. Oh, well, I thought I meant 0.94. I assumed

Re: HIG and Escape

2003-03-10 Thread James K. Lowden
On 10 Mar 2003 22:22:56 -0800, dialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know this is tangential to the debate at hand, but whenever I see > "dialogue box" and "ABCxDEF" in the same paragraph, I cringe. I don't > think a dialogue box should ever have a certain X by Y size, but should > somehow size

Re: Prefs

2003-03-12 Thread James K. Lowden
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:45:45 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Externally defined -- the dialog is designed with Glade and somehow (I'm > not sure how that'd be the easiest) connected with the prefs structure. > Pro: More exact design possible. Con: Harder to maintain. I'm going

Re: dia --version

2003-03-19 Thread James K. Lowden
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:18:12 + (GMT), Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I suggest adding a commandline option --verision and -v. > > Please file a request in Bugzilla so we dont forget. Get with the program, Alan! Dia has had that feature for, like, 45 minutes already! --jkl __

Re: File Formats (was SVG)

2003-03-30 Thread James K. Lowden
On 29 Mar 2003 13:37:47 -0800, dialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the kind of thing (I think) J.K. Lowden is interested in: > End-to-end Database1-->GenericRepresentation-->Database2. (I can confirm that.) :-) --jkl ___ Dia-list mailing list

Re: dia to sql and back

2003-04-01 Thread James K. Lowden
On 01 Apr 2003 11:27:55 -0800, dialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > indeed, but I'm not sure want I want, something very similar to the > > UML Class would be nice, but with extra database bits for things like > > constraints, and less non-db fields - fields for uniqueness would be > > good. > >

Re: Easier setting of start up layout

2003-04-03 Thread James K. Lowden
On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 16:18:01 -0600, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't want a doubleclick to open a document in a > different place than where I am, but figuring out the right one is hard. > It might be easier on Win32, which is more single-user oriented. If > there are other (Un

Re: Text is too small!

2003-06-07 Thread James K. Lowden
On 30 May 2003 14:47:24 -0700, Liberty Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just compiled Dia 0.91 on a mandrake 9.0 boxen...Running right now > with app/run_dia.sh...I like it, but text is way too small!!! I even > crank up the font size to its highest, 10, and it's still barely > readable! Are

Re: object parenting?

2003-06-09 Thread James K. Lowden
On Mon, 09 Jun 2003 08:02:22 -0500, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jun 2003, Vadim Berezniker wrote: > > Will it be possible in the future (or maybe even now) to parent an > > object? > > > > That is creating objects that are not children of the diagram, but > > children of a

xml tools

2003-06-20 Thread James K. Lowden
http://xmlstar.sourceforge.net/ I hadn't seen this project mentioned here. I thought anyone interested in perusing Dia's XML would be interested. A long time ago we bandied about the notion of Dia interacting with CVS, but were in want of a CVS option to use a patch/diff that understood XML.

Re: xml tools

2003-06-20 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 21:06:01 -0400, "James K. Lowden" wrote: > > but were in want of a CVS option to use a patch/diff that understood > XML. Well, at least that last part appears solved. On second thought It's no replacement for diff(1) and friends. It might be h

Re: How many use the diagram tree?

2003-08-10 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:11:20 -0500, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And while I'm on that subject, is there anything I can do to make > > scrolling at low maginfications faster? > > If this is with 0.91, then most likely text rendering is to blame. > Especially when using AA, it has

  1   2   >