Re: [PATCH] Database shapes and start arrow

2012-04-26 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Apr 26, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Hans Breuer wrote: > Soory, I fail to see any correlation between database references and crow's > foot notation. All right, then I will not worry about it any further. Jim ___ dia-list mailing list dia-list@gnome.org http:

Re: [PATCH] Database shapes and start arrow

2012-04-26 Thread Hans Breuer
At 26.04.2012 01:16, Jim Ursetto wrote: On Apr 25, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Hans Breuer wrote: At 25.04.2012 00:36, Jim Ursetto wrote: [...] OK. But I don't see how to set the default value for a missing optional property. It seems to set to the object creation default, which will be whatever the

Re: [PATCH] Database shapes and start arrow

2012-04-25 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Apr 25, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Hans Breuer wrote: > At 25.04.2012 00:36, Jim Ursetto wrote: >> On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Hans Breuer wrote: >>> This is not the way backward compatibility is handled in Dia. The >>> right behaviour would be to initialize to the previous default without >>> any warn

Re: [PATCH] Database shapes and start arrow

2012-04-25 Thread Hans Breuer
At 25.04.2012 00:36, Jim Ursetto wrote: On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Hans Breuer wrote: This is not the way backward compatibility is handled in Dia. The right behaviour would be to initialize to the previous default without any warning whatsoever. OK. But I don't see how to set the default

Re: [PATCH] Database shapes and start arrow

2012-04-24 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Hans Breuer wrote: > This is not the way backward compatibility is handled in Dia. The right > behaviour would be to initialize to the previous default without any warning > whatsoever. OK. But I don't see how to set the default value for a missing optional propert

Re: [PATCH] Database shapes and start arrow

2012-04-24 Thread Hans Breuer
At 23.04.2012 07:10, Jim Ursetto wrote: Hi, I noticed the database shapes set can change the end arrow type on references but not the start arrow. I was just curious if this was omitted for a reason. I did not implement it the way it is and I'm not an expert in database diagrams. But a reason