On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:36 -0300, loli wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:51:20 +0100, Lars Clausen wrote
> > Yes, there's another one out this evening. This time, there's more
> > autogapping, three, count them, three security fixes in the xfig
> > importer (ouch!), UML wrapping updates, and
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:05:23 -0300, loli wrote
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:22:13 +0100 (CET), Wolfgang Stoeggl wrote
> > The behaviour could be reproduced here under
> > v0.95-pre4 (Windows XP) according to the description.
> > A screenshot of the result after pasting is attached.
> > Regards
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:22:13 +0100 (CET), Wolfgang Stoeggl wrote
> The behaviour could be reproduced here under
> v0.95-pre4 (Windows XP) according to the description.
> A screenshot of the result after pasting is attached.
> Regards,
> Wolfgang
My results are "the same" as Wolfangs's.
I
The behaviour could be reproduced here under
v0.95-pre4 (Windows XP) according to the description.
A screenshot of the result after pasting is attached.
Regards,
Wolfgang
--- Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:36 -0300, loli wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:51:2
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:36 -0300, loli wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:51:20 +0100, Lars Clausen wrote
> > Yes, there's another one out this evening. This time, there's more
> > autogapping, three, count them, three security fixes in the xfig
> > importer (ouch!), UML wrapping updates, and
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:51:20 +0100, Lars Clausen wrote
> Yes, there's another one out this evening. This time, there's more
> autogapping, three, count them, three security fixes in the xfig
> importer (ouch!), UML wrapping updates, and a strange bug I haven't
> pinpointed in international
