> Which means it's time for a serious on-list conversation about what our next
> major objective beyond wrapping up NTS is.
Other ideas to consider...
Randomize client side ports. (big messy discussion on IEFT list)
We may want/need servers supporting NTS to support non standard port number,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:47 PM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Do you cansider the NTS documentation to be in good shape?
>
Yes, enough to get it up and running. I have moved the Quickstart from
devel/ to docs/ , and merged it into the existing documentation.
I have had an NTS server running publicl
Sanjeev Gupta :
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:47 PM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > Do you cansider the NTS documentation to be in good shape?
> >
>
> Yes, enough to get it up and running. I have moved the Quickstart from
> devel/ to docs/ , and merged it into the existing documentation.
>
> I have
Yo Eric!
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:54:54 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond via devel" wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta :
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:47 PM Eric S. Raymond
> > wrote:
> > > Do you cansider the NTS documentation to be in good shape?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, enough to get it up and running. I have moved
Release, release release!
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 9:59 AM Gary E. Miller via devel,
wrote:
> Yo Eric!
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:54:54 -0400
> "Eric S. Raymond via devel" wrote:
>
> > Sanjeev Gupta :
> > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:47 PM Eric S. Raymond
> > > wrote:
> > > > Do you cansider the NT
Yo Sanjeev!
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:03:02 +0800
Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> Release, release release!
Yes, a good time to start the release window. But I bet that, just like
with gpsd, that starts a new round of bug reports...
RGDS
GARY
--
Gary,
True, and I see you are busy with gpsd these days.
My suggestion:
The last commit to ntpsec that touched code was over two months ago. In
that sense, we have already had a quiet time :-)
Eric will look at the open issues list. I assume there is nothing critical
there, most of the reports
Yo Sanjeev!
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:19:56 +0800
Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> True, and I see you are busy with gpsd these days.
Yes, and until gpsd 3.19 ships I'm busy on that.
I agree that git head is pretty stable.
RGDS
GARY
-
NTS has been working for a while without any serious problems. We may have to
tweak a few details when the actual RFC gets published but it seems unlikely
there will be any major changes.
Is there any reason not to do a release now/soon?
If not, I'll tweak the NTS documentation to be post-re
