> Which means it's time for a serious on-list conversation about what our next > major objective beyond wrapping up NTS is.
Other ideas to consider... Randomize client side ports. (big messy discussion on IEFT list) We may want/need servers supporting NTS to support non standard port number, probably in addition rather than instead of 123. That's a hack to bypass filtering in various places to prevent the DDoS amplification from ages ago. I gather it's not uncommon to filter packets to/from port 123 longer than 48 bytes which drops NTP packets using NTS. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
