Is ntpsnmpd having it's Official Release with 1.0.1, or are we punting
to the next release?
Right now I do not believe that it would be crazy, but there are still
options that need work, and logging is not systematic and consistent
yet. The missing options I've thought of are all simple to a
Yo Ian!
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:02:00 -0600
Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
> The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for
> broad testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes
> here.]
OTOH, people will not test it until it is easy to test. So I'd suggest
put
devel@ntpsec.org said:
> The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for broad
> testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes here.]
Is there a HOWTO that tells me how to set things up?
Actually, I need something before that. Why is it interesting? What wi
Do we have any documentation describing a use case?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Gary E. Miller via devel :
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:02:00 -0600
> Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
>
> > The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for
> > broad testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes
> > here.]
>
> OTOH, people will not test it until it is
Hal Murray via devel :
> Do we have any documentation describing a use case?
Not exactly, but look at the snippets under etc/ntp.d/.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their s
>> Do we have any documentation describing a use case?
> Not exactly, but look at the snippets under etc/ntp.d/.
All those examples don't use the auto-grab feature. Most of the file names
don't end with .conf, and the one that does is a sample ntp.conf that could
be better placed up a level.
I
On 02/25/2018 04:43 PM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote:
Gary E. Miller via devel :
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:02:00 -0600
Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
[...]
OTOH, people will not test it until it is easy to test. So I'd suggest
putting it in 1.0.1, and mark "experimental".
[...] By marking
On 02/25/2018 04:39 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
devel@ntpsec.org said:
The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for broad
testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes here.]
Is there a HOWTO that tells me how to set things up?
I'll get to work on
Hal Murray :
> Is anybody actually using it? If not, why? Is it really useful? Do we think
> it will make life easier for packagers/distros?
Gary and Mark asked me for something like such an Apache-like feature
because it makes life easier for configuration-assistant software and
distro package
> You need to be running an SNMP daemon and an NTP daemon.
I've got plenty of ntp servers to experiment with.
>> Is there a HOWTO that tells me how to set things up?
> I'll get to work on that.
There may be two targets for that document. One is SNMP wizards who don't
know much about ntpd. Th
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> Gary and Mark asked me for something like such an Apache-like feature
> because it makes life easier for configuration-assistant software and distro
> packages.
Is that true in our case? It seems like it might be, but our config file is
generally simple enough that a s
Would it help if we made a chart of the status of various features cross
OSes/distros? How many different OSes/distros do we support? Can it fit on
a page? ...
How many different levels of testing are there? I'm thinking of something
like 0-3, where 0 is unknown and 3 is in regular use. (a
If we are serious about security, it seems like a good tool to add to the
collection.
Is there a HOWTO set it up? I didn't find one for NTP. Are all jaildirs
sufficiently similar that a global HOWTO is all one needs to set one up for
NTP? I found one for FreeBSD, but not much for Linux. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
