Hal Murray via devel writes:
> Near the top, it says:
>
> // _XOPEN_SORUCE needed for strptime()
> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE
Correct. However, as you said you also need siginfo_t, it needs to be
defined with a value of at least 500, so the correct _POSIX_C_SOURCE
level gets defined in addition. Real
Fred Wright said:
>> The test-all part of option-tester gets the following error.
> Why only in option-tester?
That was just a simple way to tickle the problem. (Which was why I put it
together in the first place.)
The code that causes the problem is libparse/clk_sel240x.c
Near the top, it
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
Does anybody other than me run/test on NetBSD?
Ocasionally. I have a NetBSD 6.1.5 VM.
The test-all part of option-tester gets the following error.
Why only in option-tester?
ntp_stdlib includes signal.h
Do we have to do some magic to ma
James said:
> After checking some webpages, I have a notion that NetBSD has siginfo,
> rather than siginfo_t. If they are the same struct, then a relatively
> simple #define or typedef should amend the Issue. I have not tested it
> yet.
The NetBSD man page says:
The sigaction() function confo
On Friday, June 21, 2024 1:35:59 PM PDT Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Does anybody other than me run/test on NetBSD?
I do not; I think I tested on NetBSD once or a few times years ago.
> The test-all part of option-tester gets the following error.
>
> ntp_stdlib includes signal.h
> Do we have to
