James said:
> After checking some webpages, I have a notion that NetBSD has siginfo,
> rather than siginfo_t. If they are the same struct, then a relatively
> simple #define or typedef should amend the Issue. I have not tested it
> yet.
The NetBSD man page says:
The sigaction() function conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1-1990 ("POSIX.1").
The Linux man page says:
Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)):
sigaction():
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
siginfo_t:
_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 199309L
wscript has a comment discussing this area then does:
ctx.env.CFLAGS = ["-std=c99", "-D_GNU_SOURCE"] + ctx.env.CFLAGS
It looks to me like c99 should be >= 1990, but I don't know much about
that stuff.
---------
That function is only used by ntp_sandbox from inside an #ifdef
HAVE_SECCOMP_H so I added a pair of #ifndef __NetBSD to squash this error.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
