Re: Let's get back to work

2017-10-30 Thread Mark Atwood via devel
Some additional suggested work items: * ntpsec.pool.ntp.org registered (I will take that one) * do we KNOW that the DEB and RPM distro packaging works? * get into the distros: ** setup an Ubuntu PPA (I will take that) ** setup a YUM repo (JDB, can you do that, working with GEM?) ** Debian as an alt

Re: Let's get back to work

2017-10-17 Thread Ian Bruene via devel
On 10/17/2017 05:37 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: Other possibilities welcomed. Someone who understands waf: make the build run the python tests. Note to whoever does it: you need to run them directly, python discover requires pip. -- In the end; what separates a Man, from a Slave?

Re: Let's get back to work

2017-10-17 Thread Hal Murray via devel
I was expecting VERSION to get bumped to 1.0.1 after the tarball and such. > From me: Local monitoring mode to measure and > graph the offet between a noselected GPS and NTP time. Just add "noselect" and graph peerstats. -- A possibly interesting feature in that area. I have code that wr

Let's get back to work

2017-10-17 Thread Eric S. Raymond via devel
Our week of downtime has elapsed. Matt got in the first commit this morning, removing some code (yay for removing code). Obviously the first thing we oufght to clean up is the FHS/library path issue. Also Mark and I need to test the new release script After that...I'd like to plan for a 1.1 in a