On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> Yo Royce!
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:38:04 -0900
> Royce Williams wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Gary E. Miller
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yo Achim!
>> >
>>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
>
> Yo Achim!
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:21:01 +0100
> Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> > Gary E. Miller writes:
> > > Mark was thinking of a separate ntp-tools package or option. Many
> > > distros has a X package and a matching X-tools package. We
Quoting myself on IRC today:
CSS/presentation request for the blog: something to visually separate
the byline from the text ... either more whitespace, or a line or two,
or a different color, etc.
My eyes keep trying to read the first line as:
"One of the earliest technical decisions the NTPsec
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> The successful scalarization of both 64-bit timestamp types has now
> been achieved.
Most excellent! From my vantage point in the peanut gallery, it's been
a fascinating and inspiring show.
[snip]
> 7. NTPv5? Maybe a new base protocol, m
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 02:11:12PM -0900, Royce Williams wrote:
>>
>> If those minimal changes are turned into a compile-time option, this
>> would enable adding fuzzing to the rolling test suite, perhaps using
>>
This can obviously wait until after the current CVE scramble dies down.
Below is how Stubman modified ntpd to be afl-friendly. I'm not sure,
but I think he modified ntpd to accept UDP "input" from stdin, and
created valid initial NTP UDP "packets" as test-case data with which
to to "seed" afl.
Un
