On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote:
> The successful scalarization of both 64-bit timestamp types has now > been achieved. Most excellent! From my vantage point in the peanut gallery, it's been a fascinating and inspiring show. [snip] > 7. NTPv5? Maybe a new base protocol, maybe a set of required extension blocks. I've seen Harlan refer to NPTv5 protocol changes as well: http://seclists.org/nanog/2016/Dec/307 A code fork is one thing; a protocol fork is something else entirely. How does NTPsec intend to coordinate with Classic about NTPv5? Royce _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
