Rust uses cfg attributes for most such things.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/attribute/cfg.html
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021, 21:12 Hal Murray via devel wrote:
>
> How do Rust and/or Go handle the cruft that C coders use #ifdefs for?
>
> Does that just get pushed down to a C library?
>
>
>
How do Rust and/or Go handle the cruft that C coders use #ifdefs for?
Does that just get pushed down to a C library?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Richard Laager said:
> With the caveat that there is a LOT I don't know in this space, if it was my
> call, I'd aim for an incremental conversion of ntpd to Rust and leave the
> userspace tooling in Python. After the daemon is converted, I would
> re-evaluate whether the userspace tooling shou
On 6/20/21 4:45 PM, Richard Laager via devel wrote:
I get the impression that Go has a shallower learning curve (i.e. is
easier to get started with), which is good, but may unfairly prejudice
Go in quick Go-vs-Rust "bake off" comparisons.
err... may unfairly prejudice Rust
--
Richard
On 6/20/21 2:31 AM, Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
Eric S. Raymond via devel writes:
My choice for a language to move to would be Go. Possibly one of you
can argue for a different choice, though if you agree that Go is a
suitable target I would find that information interesting.
Since the last r
>From the BufferBloat list:
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/46831
how to get at udp "cmsg" data for ipv4 and ipv6?
The Github response says to go to:
https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Questions
Which says:
Unlike many projects, the Go project does not use GitHub
Issues for general di
Hal Murray via devel writes:
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
>> I did. There's a blog post about it:
>> https://blog.ntpsec.org/2017/02/22/testframe-the-epic-failure.html
>
> From there:
>> One was what in discussion on the mailing list I later tagged "the code-path
>> split". There are two kinds of NTP
MLewis via devel writes:
> Is it worthwhile improving the current C code to a 'hardened' programming
> standard?
It's always worth trying, but not as easy as it seems. The fun with
standard is that there are so many to chose from.
> Example
> - Joint Strike Fighter standards https://www.stroust
Achim Gratz said:
> Since the last round of discussion both sides of the argument have been
> moving. If you believe that Rust will become a first-class implementation
> language for the Linux kernel, that would tip the scales in favor of rust
> considerably in my view.
Thanks.
I just watche
Eric S. Raymond via devel writes:
> My choice for a language to move to would be Go. Possibly one of you
> can argue for a different choice, though if you agree that Go is a
> suitable target I would find that information interesting.
Since the last round of discussion both sides of the argument h
10 matches
Mail list logo
